User talk:Axyjo
Welcome!
Hello, Axyjo, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Whosyourjudas (talk) 22:39, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Welcome. If you are interested in writing word definitions, you might wish to check out our sister dictionary project Wiktionary. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 00:49, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Helpme - gaim script
hey, the linkify script for gaim does not get recognized. i'm running linux ubuntu 6.06. please help me...
- The perl linkify plugin only works for gaim 1.5.0, newer versions of gaim do not work with it. I managed to get the script working using gaim 1.5.0, so the instructions at WP:SCRIPT#Gaim are ok in that respect.--Commander Keane 08:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)]
- I'm using gaim 2.0.0...... that would explain it.@kshay 10:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)]
- I'm using gaim 2.0.0...... that would explain it.
HELP ME - user page css
Where do I edit (and then make) all the fancy css used for pages like:
- Only User:AxyJo/monobook.css. If you want to style your userpage using css you would need to put it directly in the tag like <div style="stuff that would go in css file">. Hope that helps! GeorgeMoney (talk) 09:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC)]
- Not those css files... the css files that display your user page (User:AxyJo)
- Not those css files... the css files that display your user page (
- Nope, it wouldn't be possible if you arent an admin. There are some predefined styles (see MediaWiki:Monobook.css and MediaWiki:Common.css) but no admin would edit those to fix someone's userpage. GeorgeMoney (talk) 10:03, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- I mean a user page like yours... @kshay 10:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)]
- I mean a user page like yours...
Helpme
Do you require help at the moment?
- Yes... the one above this ^
- You mean using CSS on user pages? You just put it in your J Ditalk 10:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)]
- Thanks... I'll try that
- You mean using CSS on user pages? You just put it in your
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 13:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Your VandalProof Application
Dear AxyJo,
Thank you for applying for
Laromlab
FYI, I have nominated this article for deletion; I noticed you had edited earlier. You can discuss it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laromlab --Aleph-4 09:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- That edit was probably an anti-vandal edit. I don't know what a Laromlab is. @kshay 12:28, 7 October 2006 (UTC)]
Your Revert
Don't worry about it. John Reaves
Your edits to Burmese language
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, AxyJo! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, and try to reinsert the link again. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 14:28, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Bots might not understand that I'm replying, but I just tried to revert...@kshay 14:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)]
- Maybe bots don't, but I do. I don't quite understand why you reverted to this version with the edit summary "Reverted good faith edits by Angr per policy concerns. Please read up on policies and guidelines. Thanks!" —gr 14:32, 24 November 2006 (UTC)]
- It was probably a misclick. If it was, I offer my apologies. @kshay 14:35, 24 November 2006 (UTC)]
- It was probably a misclick. If it was, I offer my apologies.
- Maybe bots don't, but I do. I don't quite understand why you reverted to this version with the edit summary "Reverted good faith edits by Angr per policy concerns. Please read up on policies and guidelines. Thanks!" —
Your revert on my userpage
Thank you for reverting my userpage. BTW, remember to always warn users when reverting vandalism. BTW2, if you're interested in Counter Vandalism, take a look at
Your edits to Burj...Khalifa
Yo! I noticed you moved
- I'm not the one who moved it, but it's all over local media (I live in the UAE). I'll try to get an authoritative source ASAP. @kshay (talk) 17:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hm, I thought you did...well, just checking. The change was so sudden I thought someone might have changed it to their own name for the kick of it. Good work, and happy editing!--The Ninth Bright Shiner 00:55, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Survey for new page patrollers
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Axyjo! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Delivered by
New deal for page patrollers
Hi Axyjo,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards,