; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our
guide to writing your first article
.
Thank you. Falcon8765 (talk ) 17:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
A tag has been placed on
Article Wizard
.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
De728631 (
talk ) 19:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Just Like Clockwork (The Worst Witch), a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{
hangon }} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's
talk page . Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
De728631 (
talk ) 19:36, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hi there. I notice you've created a few articles on the worst witch series. A lot of these have come under my radar when looking for uncategorised articles. I've created the Category:The Worst Witch for you. If you put the articles you have/will create in there, and perhaps create some subcategories, it might help them to grow. Declan Clam (talk ) 02:47, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Miss Crotchet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fictional character that does not have enough notability to warrant a separate article.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ ]
Hi Azure12, I've noticed you've been creating a lot of articles about book and TV characters, often very minor ones. We generally don't have articles about every single character in a work, except for certain extremely important works like
notability for a stand-alone article. I hate to see you put in a lot of work on a dozen articles about The Worst Witch characters, for instance, only to have them all deleted or redirected to the main article. Just because something—a book character, a college dorm, a TV episode—exists does not mean it belongs in a whole separate article.
Glenfarclas (
talk ) 00:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
The article Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of how this might meet reliable sources
.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ ]
I have nominated Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks , an article that you created, for deletion . I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks . Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk ) 22:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
I have nominated Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks , an article that you created, for deletion . I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks . Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk ) 22:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Earhart's Heirloom/Ancient Greeks . Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. I42 (talk ) 18:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources , as you did to Slave Girl (My Story) . Before making any potentially controversial edits , it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk ) 23:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bloody Tower (My Story) , has been listed for deletion . If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Tower (My Story) . Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Woogee (talk ) 04:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
I have nominated Slave Girl (My Story) , an article that you created, for deletion . I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slave Girl (My Story) . Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer , his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer ) 04:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
I have nominated War Nurse (My Story) , an article that you created, for deletion . I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War Nurse (My Story) . Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. AniMate 02:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
You've created a surprising number of articles, and most if not all have been either deleted or redirected. One of the biggest reasons is that you've created articles without any
references
about subjects where references will be hard to find. Judging by the types of articles you're creating, I'm going to guess you are a younger user. I'm going to add one of our welcome templates underneath this. It gives some really useful links and will probably explain things so you have a better idea about how things work around here. If you have questions please come and ask me on my talk page.
Welcome!
Hello, Azure12, and
. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions , ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
{{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
AniMate 03:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Please stop making articles on subjects that aren't acceptable for Wikipedia. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked. Stop. AniMate 11:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
What Wikipedia is not
").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to
sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
articles for deletion
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a
talk) 01:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
The article
because of the following concern:
or a directory
. Unreferenced article, impossible to make decisions on who to include to make a suitable article.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ the article's talk page
.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ ]
]
Hey Azure12, I just reverted the edit you made to Titanic (1997 film) . Did you really mean to claim that Mamma Mia earned over 1.8 billion dollars? According to Box Office Mojo it was well less than that. Anyway, have a good day. SQGibbon (talk ) 19:54, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Let's Fight It Together has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Short film of questionable notability. "Award-winning" claimed, but no references given. No references of any kind, no IMDB page listed.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ TheRealFennShysa (
talk ) 18:36, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Please do not keep re-adding the incorrect spelling of "villain." It is not spelled "villian." ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb 21:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please stop intentionally introducing misspellings into the above-referenced article and removing my tagging. Continuing to do so will eventually be treated as ]
The article Disney/DreamWorks feud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced, potentially contentious WP:OR.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ ]
I have nominated Disney/DreamWorks feud , an article that you created, for deletion . I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney/DreamWorks feud . Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk ) 09:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
You seem to be very interested in Disney/Pixar films and have been making a lot of edits to related articles. However, the content you are adding ("Pixarfilm10 was the third film including Generic Actor after Pixarfilm2 and Pixarfilm4") is really not relevant, considering that the films usually feature a number of well-known actors, and misplaced, since the lead section is not the place for trivia.
Please, look over your talk page and consider whether the contributions you have been making so far are worthwhile or not. Wikipedia depends on the participation of everybody, but it doesn't mean that every piece of information or synthesised idea that people have should necessarily be included. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk ) 22:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles . Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk ) 23:06, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
TheRealFennShysa (
talk ) 18:19, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk ) 03:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
Dear Azure12
You can see from your talk page that there have been a lot of concerns about your editing but I can see from your contributions that you have never edited an article talk page or user talk page to discuss these concerns. Wikipedia is a collaborative project that relies on volunteers to discuss issues and reach a consensus. It is disruptive for one editor to continue to insert questionable content into articles and refuse to discuss the issue with the editors who then have to tidy up after them. I have therefore removed your editing rights. This block is indefinite in the context of no specified time. All you need to do to be unblocked is to confirm that in future you will discuss any concerns over your edits with other editors. You can do this by leaving a message on your talk page in the form of {{unblock|your message here}}
]
The article List of Pixar villains has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced WP:OR. Subjects is not notable outside their movie pages.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ ]