User talk:Azuredivay
Welcome!
Hello, Azuredivay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to
Teahouse Invitation
![]() |
Hello! Azuredivay,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:08, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
|
Overlinking
Please follow
Some links I think you should reinstate
I don't have time to fix all the problems. We don't need links to countries. We do need links to organisations and my revert removed some of those, but we should not have their names in quotes. If there's no article, the name is all we need. I don't want you to think that all of your links were wrong. But just insert them, don't revert please.
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in
For additional information, please see the
— Newslinger talk 06:39, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at HAL Tejas. You've been asked/warned about adding duplicate links to articles and adding links to common terms. You need to pay attention to this. BilCat (talk) 05:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Got it. Azuredivay (talk) 09:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pakistani nationalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
AE
I have initiated a discussion at
Regarding your edits on Reliance Industries
I appreciate the effort to introduce Indian currency formatting, however refrain from doing so in the infobox by removing the INRConvert template. This brings about a lack of standardization across articles about Indian companies. If you wish to bring about a lasting change in this matter I reccomend putting in a message on the talk page of the INRConvert template.
Regarding logo of Serum Institute of India
Hi,
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar |
Dear Azuredivay, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent efforts in helping to form a consensus at the Urdu article. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 16:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC) |
The Pakistan Star
![]() |
The Pakistan Star | |
Great work on Pakistan related articles! You do fantastic work. Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk) 23:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC) |
Minor
Please read
Looks like we are nearing a consensus. Won't you make a comment now? Aditya(talk • contribs) 05:17, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jio; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Prolix 💬 17:56, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Jio. Prolix 💬 18:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Edits to Stan Swamy
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vikram Vincent 19:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Stan Swamy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Vikram Vincent 20:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
MOS
You have been told to stop editing pages contrary to the manual of style multiple times. You have been warned multiple times but you continue to edit war and ignore attempts to gain consensus. This is your final opportunity to explain your actions. Prolix 💬 06:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Prolix: User:Azuredivay is indulging in disruptive editing across multiple pages and refuses to stop despite multiple requests. Vikram Vincent 11:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Prolix 💬 12:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Vikram Vincent 08:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- You've been blocked 48 hours for continuing to impose your own style preference on numbers in articles, contrary to the guideline at WP:GAB. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)]
- @WP:BRD. Azuredivay (talk) 03:36, 23 October 2020 (UTC)]
- OK, I've unblocked you on the assurance you will wait for consensus in the future before changing number formats. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- @
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
January 2021
- Do not add Indian scripts in lead and infobox either. Follow MOS:DOCTOR. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)]
- Maintain the WP:COMMONNAME of places please. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)]
- Maintain the
Sock puppet
Please stop vandalising wikipedia. False accusations against me of being a sock puppet are not acceptable. I edit on here under my own name and have seen no evidence from you that the original edits were investigated and shown to be invalid. Deleting content and pointing at random WP policies do not make you correct. You have deleted any discussion on the topics talk page. This is not WP policy. The only deletions I have seen on talk pages are where profanity is used. Please point me at where your actions have been agreed upon. Brian R Hunter (talk) 10:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Edits to Hotstar and violations of the Manual of Style
Could you please explain your edits here? They contradict the
September 2021
]
September 2021
New message from Passengerpigeon
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 13:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Passengerpigeon (talk) 13:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Edits to Statue of Unity without discussion
Please refrain from reverting edits without any discussion. I've been waiting for replies on articles Talk page for over a month. Instead of replying on the Talk page, you simply chose to revert the edit based on what you think is right. You've pushed an entire section containing the plight of the tribals negatively affected because of the project under "Construction" section which absolutely makes no sense. This type of suppressing or minimizing all the negative aspects of any subject constitutes POV pushing. --coolk (talk) 19:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in
For additional information, please see the
Tayi Arajakate Talk 19:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Statue of Unity
Two of your edits -
- You've reverted material twice now (see this as an Edit War notice, I don't want to template). There's enough consensus in talk archives that criticism section is warranted in that article. Your repeated removal without any talk consensus isn't productive. hemantha (brief) 08:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
WP:COMMONNAME
You had enough warnings regarding
Use edit summaries to explain the changes you make
Edit summaries are required per policy, see Wikipedia:Editing policy#Be helpful: explain. In controversial articles like Ayurveda, you shouldn't make changes without any explanation. Hemantha (talk) 10:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
How to use quotations
Addition of quote in this edit is misleading and grammatically incorrect. Quotations are used for
Hi , Thanks for your Edit. Can you explain why you remove the link ? all the link provided that is after 2016 . But my reference from 2013 . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nangeli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hellodasan (talk • contribs) 14:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
Please, stop removing "the" before "United States"
Azuredivay, I urge you to stop removing "the" before "United States" in Wikipedia articles (for instance, in "Ratanakosin-class corvette":
CS1 error on Tibetan Terrier
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tibetan Terrier, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the
]Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the
]