User talk:B7T

Don't worry, this isn't anything personal and I didn't stumble upon the article via you but by via one of the categories the article is in. --Sloane 16:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't really thinking it was. Not a problem. B7T 19:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, there's very few voters for AfD these days, which is why some AfD don't seem to get much response even after a week or so. I decided to keep away from direct voting for AfD at the moment, as per the principle that AfD closers should not be an adovacy for or aganist the article itself (for impartiality). - Best regards,

]

WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter, March 2008

	The Space-Time Telegraph
	The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter
	Issue 1	March 2008
Project News We have five new participants: Sm9800, Seanor3, T saston, Type 40, Jammy0002 . One editor has left the project: StuartDD . The Doctor Who portal has expanded to increase the number of selected stories to 33. Articles of note New featured articles None New featured article candidates Voyage of the Damned (Doctor Who) (FAC) New good articles Dalek (Doctor Who episode) Astrid Peth Delisted articles None Proposals A proposal for changing the layout of the episode pages is under way here . A discussion about the formatting of the cast lists in episode pages is under way here. A discussion to move here . News The Torchwood project has become a task-force under the project's scope. The 4th series of Doctor Who will start to air on 5th April. For the Doctor Who project, Sceptre (talk) 18:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply] You have received this letter because you are on the newsletter recipients list. To opt-out, please remove your name.

I'm interested in adding book sources to articles.

{{helpme}} I've added ISBN numbers to books mentioned in articles before, with a link to the special page allowing you to find a copy of that book; but I've noticed that there are a number of articles where no number was given. Now it's possible that this is because there are several editions of a book, but it may be that people are unaware of this feature of Wikipedia. Is there a WikiProject for people interested in adding this feature to articles that mention books or other media with ISBN numbers? Are there other standards used in addition to ISBN numbers, like Library of Congress catalog card numbers, record company catalog numbers, or UPC codes? Can you direct me to any relevant articles for Wikipedia editors? B7T (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you check out

talk) 18:23, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Just wanted to say "thank you" for your work in the laugh track article (TOC right template to eliminate whitespace/scrolling). Much appreciated.Oanabay04 (talk) 15:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I like pie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I like pie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 01:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

]

Nomination of

Universal Space

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Space until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hello, B7T. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, B7T. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, B7T. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—KidZui—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. _Mrwoogi010^✉ 16:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional nannies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 15:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PivotX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PivotX until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 16:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]