User talk:Baiter

Hi! While I appreciate your polite words on my talk page, the fact remains that "Cloud Starchaser" breaks several rules of inclusion. It is, however, the perfect sort of article for Uncyclopedia, an extremely funny, almost-anything-goes parody of Wikipedia...and yes, I'm a member. It's one of the funniest sites on the Internet and I think your article would be a good fit. Everything2 and Wikigeeks are good choices as well. Hope this helps; sorry the news isn't better. - Lucky 6.9 07:27, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for your help. What rules of inclusion does the article break?

Those of notability. Since it's not terribly well known, few if any folks outside the article's sphere of influence are highly unlikely to come looking for it.

Thanks for the barnstar and the kind words. Do you know Hank? BTW, I figured out the signature thing. Her sig was really complicated and the code didn't look like a signature at first glance. Also, did you mean to delete the earlier comments you made on my talk page? I was going to put them back on, but I wanted to make sure you didn't get rid of them for a reason. The Ungovernable Force 05:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article

criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

talk) 04:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion of "Xyience"

A page you created, Xyience, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our

guide to writing your first article

.

Thanks. Sceptre ^(talk) 17:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Nellis

Sure it's possible, and it's possible his profile may increase to the point he is notable enough to have an article if that isn't the case now. I wasn't involved in the AFD before, I really don't know what their arguments were for and against the article at the time. TastyCakes (talk) 06:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ah, here is the deletion discussion. TastyCakes (talk) 16:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]