User talk:Bamyers99/Archive 14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Invalid Navbar links

Thanks for still updating Wikipedia:Database reports/Invalid Navbar links. Does Wikipedia talk:Database reports/Invalid Navbar links mean templates using {{Sidebar with collapsible lists}} should be found? I found 17 wrong names on my own, fixed 9 and left these 8 for testing:

PrimeHunter (talk) 00:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the update. I have also found
Template:Jewish cuisine sidebar. PrimeHunter (talk
) 09:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
@
Jewish cuisine sidebar}}. That is the only template affected by that bug. --Bamyers99 (talk
) 21:06, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

15:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

16:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

18:29, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

22:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Accidental block

Apologies, I accidentally blocked you instead of the intended IP when addressing spam on the Stalkerware article. :( Undid it as soon as I realized what I had done. Brandon (talk) 21:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

17:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

17:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


00:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021


19:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

17:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject_Northern_Ireland

Hi, would you check why

WP:NIR didn't run today? I added it to the master list here
, and projects listed afterwards did work, but not this one. Thanks in advance 20:13, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

It does have a slightly different naming system, as the quality/importance cats are under "Northern Ireland-related" Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Northern Ireland-related articles by quality log. Funandtrvl (talk) 20:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
I did change the way it's listed to: WikiProject_Northern_Ireland => Northern_Ireland-related. Hopefully, that is what was incorrect the first time around. Funandtrvl (talk) 20:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
@Funandtrvl: That will fix it for next weeks run. --Bamyers99 (talk) 20:35, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for confirming! Funandtrvl (talk) 20:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

23:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Potentially dated statements

Is this cleanup category[44] exclusively populated by articles that use Template:As of or does it also include articles that use Template:Update after? Velayinosu (talk) 01:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

@Velayinosu: I take it you are asking about the cleanup listing reports. It does not include {{Update after}} which goes into Category:Wikipedia articles in need of updating and is displayed in the cleanup listings as Update needed. --Bamyers99 (talk) 14:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Okay, I think I understand now. I asked because this category seems odd compared to others. From what I can tell:
1. This is a category for things that may need to be updated rather than things that actually do need to be updated. So it's a category of potential cleanup issues rather than actual ones.
2. There are many things that are potentially outdated, not just "As of" statements. If an update is actually needed, as is done for other things, then "update needed" templates can be used.
3. This category seems to be the only category in the cleanup listing that can't be reduced to zero (besides simply removing all instances of the "As of" template) or even reduced in size by a significant amount. For that reason, it makes up a significant portion of all cleanup issues (about 10% currently for the Virus WikiProject), contributing to the large size of cleanup listings.
Overall, it seems like the "As of" template and the "Potentially dated statements" category may be unneeded. What is your opinion about this? Velayinosu (talk) 02:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

16:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

17:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

19:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Changes since last update

I am wondering is it practical to include New Issues ( similar to New articles (XXX) )?

The rationale is that new articles is showing the new issues to the article but existing articles will not be displayed if more issues are tagged to the same existing article. As I am trying to reduce both number of articles and issues, I can easily tackle article count based on addition and removal of articles but for issues, I will need to compare the history.

Potentially the number of issues increasing/decreasing can be big, dependingon how big the wikiproject is, I am thinking to just show articles which has increased issues (no need a break down of which issues are added) so editors can tackle the new issues as well.

This might be a poor idea or not easily implemented but I think it will be helpful for editors trying to control/reduce the number of issues as well. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 06:37, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

@Justanothersgwikieditor: If you go to the Alphabetic listing you can sort by the Oldest column and get issues sorted by year-month. --Bamyers99 (talk) 18:07, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
@Bamyers99: Oh I forgot about that! CS1 errors and some other issues do not have a datestamp due to the nature of the issue but I think I can live with that. Thanks! --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

16:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

21:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

ARY reversion

Oh, I see what you mean. I don't know what caused that, but will contact the script maintainer now. Sorry to cause this. Tony (talk) 05:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

15:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

15:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

13:47, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

17:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

17:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)