User talk:BardJrinnan

This is BardJrinnan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scantrol AS (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CharlieMehta was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth
(not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent
of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scantrol AS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted
.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Charlie (talk) 03:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BardJrinnan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Charlie (talk) 03:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scantrol AS (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scantrol AS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted
.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley (talk) 13:12, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scantrol AS (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lijil was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm pretty sure the company is notable. But the article still reads a bit like a product catalogue. There is too much detail about each product and this seems written for potential buyers rather than for, say, a 10th grader in Bergen who really wants to work in ocean technology and wants to know more about it and has heard of Scantrol but doesn't really know what they do. That kid would not be able to read the article as currently written. Or think about a journalist for a mainstream newspaper who doesn't understand the technology but has heard that there is interesting stuff going on with subsea tech and came across the company name and is wondering whether it would be possible to do a feature story that is both about tech companies and has human interest. Or the potential employee, a brilliant young scientist, just wanting to know a bit more than the corporate website says. Or a 17-year-old who is writing a school essay about how AI is used in fishing. Or the tech journalist who is writing a story about wartime attacks on subsea cables and wonders whether non-military subsea tech might be relevant. I'm not saying you should write ABOUT all these things in the article (unless you can find reliable, independent sources and so on) but think about these people as potential readers of your article. Could you revise the article so any of these people could read it? I deleted a bit of the description of one of the products because it just went on and on. Maybe some can go back but please do consider the broad audience of the Wikipedia. I think it'll do both your company and all our readers more good! Other details: The added source from Finansavisen appears to say something a bit different from your bit about the great finances, but I didn't spend a lot of time looking at this, so it's fine if you want to revise this, but do understand that Wikipedia articles will tend to grow in ways that your employer may not want, and that criticism and negative press and controversies need to be included. I couldn't find anything more controversial or critical than the lower than hoped profits during covid though.Also, it's not clear to me whether Scantrol Deep Vision is a separate entity or not. If they belong in the same article perhaps the fish identification tech should also be mentioned more in the lede?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scantrol AS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted
.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lijil (talk) 10:57, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scantrol AS (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scantrol AS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted
.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 03:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Files for Upload request: Scantrol logo

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main Files for upload page. The request will be archived shortly; if you cannot find it on that page, it will probably be at this month's archive. Regards, cyberdog958^Talk 00:38, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]