Wikipedia:Business' FAQ
for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Mh29255 (
talk ) 19:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mh29255 (talk ) 19:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
]
A
dated prod
}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
]
A
dated prod
}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
]
Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia , you will be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 21:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest . In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam );
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view , verifiability , and autobiography .
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see
]
In (belated) response to your query on my talk page: To be honest, I hadn't looked at the other pages you cited. Perhaps they need to be looked at more closely as well, but my assessment of your articles, fallible though it may be, was based purely on their own merits. The thing to remember here is that because pretty much anyone can create an article, and because not all articles get all the attention they deserve, the fact that an article has been around for a while does not necessarily constitute any sort of "Seal of Approval" by the editing community. Generally speaking, using the existence or quality of Article X as an argument in favor of keeping Article Y doesn't carry a whole lot of weight.
Feel free to ask further questions, though I may be tardy in answering since I've been busy with off-wiki stuff lately. Take care. --Finngall talk 18:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an
explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions . --FairuseBot (talk ) 05:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article
Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences has been
proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A search for references failed to find significant coverage in notability
.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ ]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see
]
Problem with your custom signature
You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.
The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext . However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.
The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.
Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences .
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup. "
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences .
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup. "
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.
More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature . If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures . Thank you. 18:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)