User talk:Based guyy
Welcome!
Hello, Based guyy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — billinghurst sDrewth 23:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Contentious edits
Hi. I am guessing that it has been you adding components to the article Vejce ambush both by this username and by the other means. As the earlier edits were reverted, and it is not appropriate to just keep banging away adding text again by the same means, I have again returned the article to its status quo. We have a process to discuss challenged/contentious/... changes through the talk page of articles, and that is what should be done here, rather than an edit war. I think that some guidance from the Teahouse would also be appropriate.
|
Hello! Based guyy,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!
|
— billinghurst sDrewth 23:27, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
November 2023
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 04:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 11:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to the
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the
In particular note that you aren't allowed to edit in this topic area until you have at least 500 edits elsewhere. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at
Contentious topics notice: Eastern Europe and the Balkans
You have recently made edits related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans. This is a standard message to inform you that Eastern Europe or the Balkans is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. signed, Rosguill talk 16:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
November 2023
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Battle of Lojane. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. StephenMacky1 (talk) 18:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Bojane attack
The article
This incident was a part of the Battle of Radusha and is already mentioned
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the
December 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. You keep adding unsourced content to articles. This conduct needs to stop. StephenMacky1 (talk) 12:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2001 insurgency in Macedonia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please self-revert and discuss changes on the talk page. StephenMacky1 (talk) 13:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia!
Welcome Based guyy!I'm Sm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely, Sm8900 (talk) (Leave me a message) 14:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Sm8900 (talk) 14:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. signed, Rosguill talk 20:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)- You are not allowed to repeatedly insist on the same revisions to pages past objections, and are required to proceed to the talk page and reach a consensus to resolve disputes. The above block prevents you from editing articles directly, but allows you to continue editing talk pages normally. I would recommend using this time to make the case for your desired changes on relevant talk pages. signed, Rosguill talk 21:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia!
Welcome Based guyy!I'm Sm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes
~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely, Sm8900 (talk) (Leave me a message) 17:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Sm8900 (talk) 17:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
January 2024
Please stop. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did at 1981 protests in Kosovo, you may be blocked from editing. Over the last few years, there's been a number of places in the English Wikipedia where people tried to write about how Yugoslavia and Albania were at some sort of a secret war and whatnot. Please discuss any such matters on Talk pages first, because this is is clearly a contentious topic. Joy (talk) 11:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Reviewing the past warnings and blocks that were issued here, I will reiterate that we as a community need to make sure you've understood what sort of behaviors are unacceptable. This is not very promising at this point, but I'm not going to instantly block access. Please use this opportunity to demonstrate the ability to edit in a constructive fashion. --Joy (talk) 11:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2001 insurgency in Macedonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonians.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
POW template
Hey man. The POW template you insist on adding actually only belongs in infobox military conflict templates, not civil conflicts. I hope that clears it up too. Thanks. StephenMacky1 (talk) 12:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Kumanovo-Lipkovo offensive for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumanovo-Lipkovo offensive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.StephenMacky1 (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Gulnabad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seyyed Abdollah.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
RfC
Siege of Khan Yunis has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 16:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
1RR violation
You have violated Wikipedia’s
- Please revert your edit. Your edit contradicts the Siege of Khan Yunis article and violates Wikipedia’s policies. Please do not edit the article further without reverting your edit. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 18:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit (blether) 16:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)