User talk:Beansandveggies

Kelly Preston

I don't mind discussing things at all, but if you would, please don't address me personally in edit summaries. There's no policy against it, but it looks a bit odd to others looking at the article and in a way, imparts an appearance of dissension (mostly based on history of editors warring). Thanks! Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neither am I. I just wanted to let you know. The only time I ever see my name in an edit summary is when I've P.O.'d someone. Cheers. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Banning ip's

Thanks for the message on my talkpage. We don't ban ip's, since they are generally re-allocated to a different individual after a time (perhaps every time someone logs on, sometimes weeks) and a ban might effect someone innocent of vandalising. Where there is reasonable certainty that the ip is assigned (schools, etc.) we will block up to a year after persistent vandalism. Otherwise, it is a case of reverting, reporting and blocking (with increasing tariffs if necessary). Cheers. LessHeard vanU (talk) 11:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Barnstar

Thank you very much. Just a word, though; generally you place the barnstar on the editors talkpage, and they then place it as they desire. I very much doubt anyone is going to complain, but that is how it usually works. Anyhoo, thank you again. LessHeard vanU (talk) 11:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Latinos in film, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William Levy and Rico Rodriguez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]