User talk:Biophily

Archives

[1]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Biophily I am guessing that you have reevaluated your attitude on some things now because of feedback received. I do think you could back track with your AFD thing suggestion as I think you acted out of anger or frustration. Jose Antonio Pineda may not be a household name but few poets are especially in the U.S. area. He has written a couple of books, and they are not self published but were published by publishing houses. He has a long history of performing in many areas of the world. I think its a pity if you maintain the very negative aspect of "trailing, peoples edits. Earl King Jr. (talk) 23:39, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't intend to trail it, just noticed it when examining your history with the Fresco article. I would say he is still not notable enough by Wikipedia's standards. But honestly I don't feel like handling the AfD.--Biophily (talk) 02:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bad answer, but its your answer. I do think now that being topic banned from the Fresco related things is in order because I have run out of patience now with your kind of editing. Stalking other editors is pretty low. Earl King Jr. (talk) 08:56, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not stalking when you are trying to figure out a pattern of edits.

I don't know why that is a bad answer. I don't see how whether I said the guy is notable or not should make a difference in whether you think I should be topic banned.

And what are you talking about, that was a while ago. And I haven't touched the Fresco article for a week. Why are you bringing this up now?--Biophily (talk) 19:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, did you not deliberately stock me on the internet? Let's not forget that. At least I noticed the Pineda article only in passing. It wasn't my aim. You on the other hand deliberately set out to invade my privacy.--Biophily (talk) 19:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are a public persona adjunct to Fresco and his organization and a part of Fresco's information on the internet. My idea is not whether you think the poet notable, it is a compilation of your tendentious editing, circular abstracted thinking about how you perceive the article and nasty negative attitude toward other editors and accusations of conspiracy or secret agenda against others on the article.

The stalking you have done on other article is just another aspect. Earl King Jr. (talk) 22:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to my comment on the Fresco talk page. The reference to conspiracy was about YOU speculating about Fresco conspiring to promote himself by various means. We can't verify any of that so it shouldn't be used as reasoning on the talk page.

The fact is, your stalking of me is far worse. I reviewed your history of edits on Fresco because I also believed you exercised abuses. That is a legitimate reason.--Biophily (talk) 22:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that is the problem. Exercised abuses? Even with the new editors saying that is not the case it is your rational. Earl King Jr. (talk) 00:18, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are not familiar with the deep history of your relation to the article. Moving on.--Biophily (talk) 00:19, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning It is never appropriate to attack other editors on Wikipedia [2] discuss issues in articles without name calling or resorting to tendentious personality issues and conflicts You somehow got Bobrayner to do your third revert for you, which is getting suspicious has hell considering the fact that somehow he keeps a close enough eye on the article to participate only to do your third revert, every time, yet won't even respond to my questions about the Fresco article on his talk page. end quote Biophily from the page. Earl King Jr. (talk) 16:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack? There are patterns that warrant suspicion. Any reasonable person would notice the peculiar pattern and have a thought.--Biophily (talk) 17:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Hi, I'm messaging you as one of three most recent talk-page contributors to The_Venus_Project. I seem to be having difficulty reaching a consensus with another editor on the talk-page at Talk:The_Venus_Project#Info_on_split_with_Zeitgeist. In case the article might not be on your watchlist and you might still be interested in the topic, I wanted to bring the discussion to your attention (in the hopes of getting a third, informed opinion). Best, startswithj (talk) 05:04, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Imran Khan. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Succession box. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Robert Peter Gale. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mahatma Gandhi. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ulises Heureaux. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:A Fine Frenzy. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stephen Cambone. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Damat Ibrahim Pasha. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paul Singer (businessman). Legobot (talk) 00:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aaron Schock. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention is called to the discussion at Talk:Malta#Which map should we use in main infobox? Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Your input is requested about an RFC regarding Donald Trump. Here is a link directly to that RFC. The lead of that biography currently says, "Many of his statements in interviews, on Twitter, and at campaign rallies have been controversial." The RFC proposes to insert the words "or false" at the end of that sentence. Thank you in advance for participating. If you have the time, there is a second RFC at that talk page which proposes to instead add the words "or hyperbolic".Anythingyouwant (talk) 00:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Laura Prepon. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tupac Shakur. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emmett Till. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gisele Bündchen. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bob Stoops. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Randy Quaid. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox philosopher. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jack Posobiec. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biophily. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply