User talk:Blancab19904

I'm sorry I Didn't know but I understand completely I apologize thank you Blancab19904 (talk) 22:52, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not an online discussion forum, it is not social media. Please do not post your general opinions and ideas on Wikipedia talk pages. Discussion on article talk pages should about improvements to the article, and not general discussions on the subject. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

how does anyone fix anything ever that is locked? I do not understand the process of fixing correcting a locked page. The information is not correct that page explaining many things but there actually was not a single case taken by the Supreme Court it was only rejected they refused to work the case so that's not proof of him losing his case or spreading a big lie. That's exactly what this page is doing its incredibly deceptive. They are really smart and can try to write all the smart incorrect information and look right but everyone knows its s big lie and it's a disgrace that your not allowing anyone to even comment on it

Hello, I'm Dewritech. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dewritech (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dewritech. An edit that you recently made to Bank for International Settlements seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dewritech (talk) 17:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wiiformii. I noticed that you recently removed content from Big lie without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wiiformii (talk) 00:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Big lie. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wiiformii (talk) 01:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Big lie, you may be blocked from editing. Wiiformii (talk) 01:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not removed properly cited portions of articles, even if you like or dislike Donald Trump, see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Wiiformii (talk) 01:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big lie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 01:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]