User talk:Bluee Mountain
Welcome!
|
I merged
- Have you read Help:Merging_and_moving_pages#Performing_the_merger? It goes into detail about this. Basically, replace the Residual sugar article with #REDIRECT [[Sweetness of wine#Residual sugar]] {{R from merge}} Tombomp (talk/contribs) 10:35, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for comment Bluee. Sorry about your illnesses. Hope your recoveries were complete and that you had fun at least until you got them!!
Calamitybrook (talk) 05:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
You're welcome. They are not pleasant, but I survived. Bluee Mountain (talk) 11:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Merge/etc
Trust you are not into banking or too close to NY :) - it seems if one puts some people behind a keyboard it gives them their collective angst which they need to spray or impose on unsuspecting victims - which is same as what giardia did for me (at the other end) way way back (in time that is) - trust you never got that - cheers
No, not into banking :) -
Cheers
Bluee Mountain (talk) 11:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
I have responded to your concerns. Perhaps consider
Sincerely,
La Pianista (T•C•S) 06:40, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Paella Article
Please put your divisions back in the paella article. I can see I have a friend in you. If Texas Pete reverts it then I'll revert it back. Thanks for your help. I appreciate it. LuisGomez111 (talk) 23:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Of course. I added the International Paella again. And moved one sentence to the Valencian Paella. Thank you. Bluee Mountain (talk) 11:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Paella Article RFC
I've placed a "Request For Comment" tag on the bottom of the discussion page for this article in an attempt to initiate dispute resolution. I noticed you, user:Mountolive and Texas Pete arguing a bit. Please participate. LuisGomez111 (talk) 18:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Not much, actually. The general problem is solved. (He wrote
Bluee Mountain (talk) 19:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
October 2008
I have heard the story. Yes, 'user Warrington' is living with me. And yes we were talking about the article (paella). And why not? Wikipedia is not going to make the rules in my house..
It is a nice idea sharing all the knwledge, but the information on Wikipedia is often unprecise and unreliable, conflicts between editors are frekvent, some editors only spoil other peoples work, you are harrasing your users and the project is not worth the time and energy invested in it..
Bluee Mountain (talk) 20:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
See Warrington's talk page. Please email me. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:44, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi. OK. I believe you and will
Thank you for unblocking me, but I was disappointed with several things about what happened.. I understand how you were thinking, but I'm not sure I feel the same way I did before for this project. It is a result of these unpleasant conflicts.
Thank you for your message.
Bluee Mountain (talk) 18:26, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Thomas Edison
Did you actually find the passage confusing, so you thought Engle was talking about his own mother? That is surprising, since Edison had been mentioned in the preceding sentence. Personally, I find pronouns useful and succinct rather than repeating the noun each time. Regards. Edison (talk) 18:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
X
After all this trouble, I made only one (considered uncontroversial, I hoped) edit, one single word, typing Edison instead of He, editing a meaning about him. And I already run into a new conflict. This is not my cup of tea, being forced to quarrel about every little edit, every common sense small changes with stubborn editors, being pulled into meaningless controversies. Editing Wikipedia is a complete waste of time.
Bluee Mountain (talk) 21:10, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current