User talk:Bmeyette
Welcome!
Hello, Bmeyette, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I noticed your interest in aircraft-related articles. There is a group of editors here at Wikipedia who have come together to form WikiProject Aircraft in order to improve aircraft-related articles. You are invited to check us out and, if interested, join our team. Our project page has a lot of resources as well as article guidelines that you might find helpful.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! (I saw your note on the LJ crash page that it was your first-ever edit - congrats and again, welcome!) Akradecki 19:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Mission Impossible
Hi. To add a reference, first make sure the article has a References or Notes section. If it does, then place <ref> at the start of the citation and </ref> at the end, and do this right after the piece of information you've added. There is a proper format for citations, but don't worry about that. Just treat it like a bibiography: author, article title, publication, publication date, and URL if it's online. An alternate (which is discouraged but considered better than no citation is with websites to simply place a single square bracket at the start and end of the URL (including the http bit) and it'll create a footnote-like link automatically. The policy
Disambiguation link notification for July 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anna Lee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Carroll. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Bmeyette. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in
For additional information, please see the
Doug Weller talk 12:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
March 2022
Hello, I'm FormalDude. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ––FormalDude talk 06:54, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Stop it
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Robert F. Kennedy Jr., you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julius Senegal (talk • contribs) 13:26, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review