User talk:BoMadsen88

I would like to be unbanned immediately. I am sorry that I posted my observation on the wrong page. That will not happen again. However, since my observation has now led to his banning from editing the Elon Musk article because of all the reasons I stated, I do not see why I should remain blocked. I did in no way harass QRep2020, I only pointed out what might be strong COI to help make Wikipedia better and since you yourself agreed with my reasoning I succeeded in that goal. That is exactly what editors on Wikipedia should strive to do, and I was one of only a few editors who pointed it the potential problem out. BoMadsen88 (talk) 21:19, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've converted the sitewide block to a

Hello, as stated above my sitewide block has been converted to a p-block for the Elon Musk Article only. However, this should be removed as well. I was banned because of “conducting an ongoing harassment campaign against QRep2020” (Qreps2020 quote). But the only thing I did was pointing out my observation that the behaviour of was QRep2020 had been very problematic. QRep2020 has now been p-blocked by the exact same reasons that my work and research unraveled. It is therefore fair to say that QRep2020s problematic behaviour has only been uncovered and stopped now thanks to my observations and persistence. The reason that I have was p-blocked in the first place is now not valid anymore. This also means that I was NOT blocked in the first place because of WP:SPA as you allude to. But just to actually counter that argument you can clearly see that my profile was created long before I posted my observations on the Elon Musk Talk-page, and while I have not made many edits you can also see that I have made edits before to completely unrelated articles in the past. So please stop saying that my contributions are far more SPA than that of QRep2020". That is clearly NOT a "fact". I only tried to make one of the most visited articles on Wikipedia less biased because of very problematic behavior I had witnessed for a long time. I accomplished that and I believe that is what every good Wikipedia editor should strive to do - don’t you too? QRep2020 had a lot of edits on Elon Musk which gave him an authority on the page - this meant that other Wikipedia editors did not dare push the matter whenever anyone tried to point out the obviously biased sections in the article. And there has been many editors throughout the last 2 years that has tried in vain to make the article less negatively biased - each and every time QRep2020 has immediately shot the attempts down. I am sorry I had to post my observations on the Elon Musk page, but I did not know where else to go. That will not happen again. BoMadsen88 (talk) 12:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See

So NinjaRobotPirate has elaborated and said that the reason for his decline of my request was: "It doesn't matter what other people have done when we're discussing your behavior". I AM talking about my own behaviour: of course one has to refer to the actions that has happened, since that is the entire reason for my initial ban. And I had to make it clear to the moderators that the reason for why I was banned is now not valid. As I clearly state: I was banned for "conducting an ongoing harassment campaign against QRep2020", and that has now been cleared out as not being the case - but before you knew that I obviously had to tell about the situation. The point is: "My behavior" has now been cleared out as not violating any rules. Hence my p-ban should be removed. BoMadsen88 (talk) 18:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is you don't recognize your faults. You said there is a good chance that he is a short seller in Tesla this sort of speculation is not allowed. PhilKnight (talk) 22:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How come this is not being reviewed? BoMadsen88 (talk) 21:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please be patient. PhilKnight (talk) 22:24, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]