User talk:Boffo
I enjoy these, fill it up. If you want to avoid red tape, images deleted, and other holier-than-thou users changing your edits try Uncyclopedia
Your edit to Wii
The source you provided uses numbers from VG Charts, a site which has been agreed is unreliable for sales numbers since they guess their numbers. TJ Spyke 08:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Panasonic-q300.jpg
Thanks for uploading
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
- Wikipedia:Image use policy
- Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Éowyn (band)"
A page you created,
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our
Thank you.
June 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an
In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
- Funny. You reported me for breaking WP:3RR, then you go and break it! --Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)]
- Amazing isn't it. But really, it was more like putting it back in pristine shape before this started. --Boffo (talk) 02:08, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
- The other editor earned a 24-hour block. As WP:ELNO is a guideline and not a policy, as such it can be ignored", I could pursue this further by making my case on the talk page, but that's fine. The official site has the links, and if it's that big of a deal regarding social media in 2011, I'll let it go. I'm happy with the outcome. Boffo (talk) 15:26, 28 June 2011 (UTC).]
- The other editor earned a 24-hour block. As
- Amazing isn't it. But really, it was more like putting it back in pristine shape before this started. --Boffo (talk) 02:08, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)- Please note that users are entitled to delete talk page messages from their own talk page. Such actions are considered to represent that the user has read the note, but they are not prohibited from removing them. --Ckatzchatspy 18:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
- Unwarranted and provocative messages directed at a user you have been edit warring with can be considered as disruptive behaviour on your part. If you repeat these type of actions, you may well incur another block. Please consider this your only warning, given that you have indicated your actions were deliberate in nature. --Ckatzchatspy 18:08, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Boffo. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review