User talk:Boomvavavoom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Hello, and

INDIGO VERTIGO, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars
. Happy editing!

Susvolans 12:40, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Boomvavavoom, Would it be possible for you to help in the translation of the article Nederlands Spoorwegmuseum into English. The one on the English Wikipedia, is really bad (in other words it sucks.) Please reply as soon as possible by leaving a message on my talk page. Cheers, JP 17:01, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't Matter

Dear Boomvavavoom ,

It doesn't matter,

Jean-Paul 13:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites
. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Sequential swap. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. DarkSaber2k 11:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dogwitch.jpg

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

talk) 05:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cavewoman10thanniversary.jpg

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

talk) 21:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies
.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. UltraMagnus (talk) 08:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Holly Golightly (artist)

A

its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RMHED (talk) 19:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The article Rick Basaldua has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, notability therefore unclear

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 01:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply
]


MERU, Holland

I see from your user page that you live in Vlodrop. I've written/compiled a new article on a property in the neighborhood

MERU, Holland, the old Kolleg St. Ludwig. Since I don't read either Dutch or German I couldn't add as many recent local sources as I'd have liked. If you have anything to add or correct your input would be appreciated.   Will Beback  talk  22:41, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks. Nice compilation and the only thing I found in error is the fact that the demolition was done due to the old structure. It is an old building but the only reason they wanted to demolish this was due to the situation not facing East or something like that. Terrible attitude! --boomvavavoom (talk) 11:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Broken frontier

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of

Cntras (talk) 09:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Boomvavavoom/Martin Montiel has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Martin Montiel, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 15:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Articles for creation

Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Martin Montiel. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  18:07, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Martin Montiel, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request

Userfication
of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
WP:REFUND/G13
. Thank you for your attention.
talk) 05:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello Boomvavavoom. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Martin Montiel.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Martin Montiel}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.

talk) 23:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

nl:Nederlands Spoorwegmuseum