User talk:Butros
|
|
WikiProject California
Hi, I noticed your contributions and thought you might be interested in joining WikiProject California.
Greetings from WikiProject California!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/01/Flag_of_California.svg/180px-Flag_of_California.svg.png)
Welcome to WikiProject California!
I noticed you recently added yourself to our Participants' list, and I wanted to welcome you to our project. Our goal is to facilitate collaboration on California-related articles, and everyone is welcome to join. Here are some suggested activities:
- Discuss with other members at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject California
- Cleanup some of the articles listed for cleanup
- Have a look at the Article alerts
As a member it would be helpful if you would
- Add the project page to your watchlist
- Add yourself to the participant category, either by adding a userbox, or by adding [[Category:WikiProject California participants|{{PAGENAME}}]] to your userpage.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, or feel free to ask me on my talk page.
Again, welcome! -Optigan13 (talk) 06:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Awesome.
![]() |
The California Star | |
For all your hard work on Southern California transit-related articles, I'd like to award you this star. Keep up the good work. -- Talk to me!) 10:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC) ]
|
- Muchas gracias, my transit amigo. Spring break = Good transit articles! :D ~ Butros (talk) 10:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Re: Metrolink
Well, I can't say for certain what would be needed for an A-class rating, as I'm not particularly familiar with the criteria, but I will say that the article certainly looks better, reads better and is better referenced that before. That said, I disagree with putting some of the section order moves you made. As almost all of "Future expansion" is about new lines, it should come after the section on lines, or maybe become a subsection of it. The notable accidents section should be towards the end, as it is less relevant to the railroad than the various physical characteristics such as rolling stock, etc. (though when Metrolink does have an incident they are doozies.) Finally, I'd switch the infobox so the logo is above the locomotive picture. As the article is about the railroad, not the model of locomotive it uses, it's branding should come first. Overall, though, superb work. Where's a railroad barnstar when you need it?oknazevad (talk) 14:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Los Angeles mayoral election, 2013
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
Jojhutton
If he is failing to participate in discussions and is unilaterally reverting edits he could be blocked for making disruptive edits. I myself cannot make the block as I am an involved editor, but you can use the
- The consensus was reached on the talk page
- The user continues to revert, despite the fact that he was invited to the discussion and did not participate
- WhisperToMe (talk) 00:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
School Gyrls & associated
Hi, sorry if I messed the csd templates up - I patrol pages manually so must have made a typo (Also why I'm slow putting the warnings on their user page). I also wasnt sure whether its normal to have 2 csd templates on the one page, but though it'd be better to leave them both to give admins more info if someone tries to recreate the page. Cheers Clovis Sangrail (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Move discussions in progress
There are four move discussion in progress, on
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on
Jojhutton
Jojhutton is continuing to remove portal links from San Diego and OC articles, even after I told him to stop... again: Check out the contributions list Special:Contributions/Jojhutton - I linked him to the WikiProject California discussion page to show him that we have a consensus now on both Greater LA and San Diego. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Looks like it's all been resolved...sorry, I was slow on the draw. Butros (talk) 19:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Officeholder Height discussion
Check out the proposal I made at Template talk:Infobox officeholder#Height! Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 22:32, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject United States
--
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.
For established users such as yourself there is
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of
Orphaned non-free image File:Edhshawk.JPG
![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.
You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:12, 30 October 2011 (UTC).
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
![]() |
You are invited to participate in the here !
|
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
FYI
Metrolink (California), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Sportsguy17 (T • C) 03:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)