User talk:CRINJ

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

I also suggest that you read the

You might also want to read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Specifically about it not being a soapbox or means of promotion, it is not a blog, webspace provider, or social network, and Wikipedia is not a battleground, so definitely not somewhere for you to gather people to go to Facebook and wage some kind of campaign. Waging that campaign here, or attempting to, will not end well for you. Heiro 05:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ENDING FREE SPEECH IS ALSO AGAINST WIKIPEDIA RUES

CRINJ (talk) 05:54, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No it isn't.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:55, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Also,

personal attacks such as [1] and [2], as well as threatening to reveal peoples real life phone numbers, etc. will get you blocked, please do not repeat this behavior. Heiro 06:03, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:04, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SO DELETE IT EXCEPT THE PART ABOUT US CRINJ (talk) 06:06, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 06:15, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CRINJ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

THIS IS A RINJ INFILTRATION we did nothing wrong but speak the truth. TRUTH IS NOT VANDALISM CRINJ (talk) 06:32, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia isn't the place to war amongst yourselves. —

foxj 07:47, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This page/user is in no way associated with the group CRINJ. Please delete and ban user immediately. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forestdaisy (talk • contribs) 08:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The

RINJ page will be deleted soon enough, I'd bet. Is that what you were asking for? Doc talk 08:27, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The RINJ page should be removed on the grounds that they are not a notable enough group to be included in Wikipedia, but this user should also be banned and the page deleted as they are not associated with CRINJ and are practicing vandalism and impersonation. Please check IPs if possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forestdaisy (talk • contribs) 08:31, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They are blocked indefinitely, and it doesn't look likely that they will convince any admin to unblock them anytime soon. To "ban" them would at least require that they be tied (with evidence) to another, preexisting, account of an already banned or blocked user. Do you have any idea who this editor might be? Doc talk 08:37, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A sock puppet account for Micheal O'Brien, username Mobrien9279 and Nymphetamine labyrinth. He has multiple accounts on Facebook and MySpace that he uses for the same thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forestdaisy (talk • contribs) 08:40, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this is pretty weird. Too many

salted, and we can all move on to productive things. Cheers. Doc talk 08:51, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for your help. I just want it all deleted. It has no place here. --Forestdaisy (talk) 08:56, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]