User talk:CZmarlin/Archive 2019

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Dear Mr Ziemnowicz

As requested this is to inform you that I intend to publish your Wikipedia image of a DeSoto Firedome car in a forthcoming book about 1950s American cars. A credit will be published next to this image.

If you have any objections please let me know at [email protected]

Yours sincerely Hugh Morrison Editor, Montpelier Publishing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.167.165.243 (talk) 13:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi Hugh, Many thanks for using the image I have posted on Commons! There are actually two different DeSoto Firedomes that I have photographed. Both are 1956 models: a two-door hardtop (no "B" pillar) and a four-door sedan. I trust that you will have susses with your book! CZmarlin (talk) 23:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

useing it for a school project had a muscle car book i had to make a video for i have a work cited page at the end i will put all credits there — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.107.223.2 (talk) 11:59, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

using it for a video project in school on a muscle car book — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.107.223.2 (talk) 12:02, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello 216.107.223.2, I hope you enjoyed working on your video for a school project. More importantly, I trust that you followed all the requirements and submitted an outstanding assignment to earn a top grade! CZmarlin (talk) 23:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

I just wanted to let you know that I am planning to use your picture Indianapolis Motor Speedway - Gate #1 in a Youtube Video about the death of Tony Renna. Of course I am going to give you apropriate credits for your work. Thanks for sharing your images on wikipedia it is a big help for independent content creators like me.

You are most welcome to use the images I posted to Commons. My principal objective is to share what I have encountered. It is good to know that you are able to use it! CZmarlin (talk) 23:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Witaj,

z Twojego zdjęcia File:The Wladyslaw Jagiello monument in NYC 5.jpg zrobiłem - przycinając je z czterech stron - File:The Wladyslaw Jagiello monument in NYC 5 cropped.jpg

Dzięki temu lepiej się wyświetla na stronie Pomnik Władysława Jagiełły w Nowym Jorku

Pozdrawiam Julo (talk) 15:41, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Część Julo, Thank you for making the modifications and using it to help illustrate the Polish article about the Wladyslaw Jagiello monument in New York City's Central Park. CZmarlin (talk) 23:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Can i use the picture to post on instagram for research purposes only.

Hi, of course you may use it! It is a rather unique engine given that there are so many million copies of it! CZmarlin (talk) 23:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

You are recipient no.

.

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me. Jsnueva1022 (talk) 06:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Christopher,

Thanks for posting you image on Wiki. We will be using your image of the 1953 imperial AC vents in one of our training videos on Aircondition F-Gas. This will appear ourvirtualacademy.com some time soon.

many thanks Simon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.242.125 (talk) 15:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Simon, You are most welcome! Glad to know that you can use it to help illustrate a training video! CZmarlin (talk) 23:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

First, thanks for your recent edit on PLC, CZ - you seem focused on maintaining the "mass market" element in the article. I have a question - as I understand it from reading non-wiki source material, PLC is a term invented by Ford to market the 1958 Thunderbird. PLC became a distinct market segment after the success of the 1958 Thunderbird. The article seems to have veered off into describing a random group of low volume two door luxury cars as PLC. If any low volume two-door luxury car with a whiff of sporting pretension is PLC, then why not the 1952 Bentley R Type Continental? Seems like a rabbit hole, one you strip mass market away. In your opinion, why is the rather unremarkable 1953 Cadillac Eldorado the first PLC (dubious ref aside)? PLawrence99cx (talk) 01:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello PLawrence99cx, I agree that there is too much emphasis on a variety of early models in this article. In particular, expensive and limited run versions marketed before the concept of "personal luxury" even became known. Following this logic, it could even be possible to categorize many sporty low production models as "personal luxury" all the way back to the earliest days of automobiles. Nevertheless, there need to be some authoritative references that will help focus the coverage in this article to what are generally categorized in the "personal luxury" market segment. Once I have a bit more "free" time, I will try to cull this article! CZmarlin (talk) 23:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Just a thought, this car was definitely a metric design - perhaps the IP was correct. As long as the output is the same.  Mr.choppers | ✎  14:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for following up on this change in the built-in dimension formulas. You are correct that these cars were originally built with metric, but most common at the time was using the US measurements. I have corrected the US measurements in the formulas to those provided in the Dodge Omni brochure. I think the biggest problem that the contributor seemed to be making only random "drive-by" changes to the long established dimension formulas in several automobile articles. In my opinion, their edit was not a change to make the Dodge Omni article better. Thanks! CZmarlin (talk) 23:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello!

I am planning on using your picture for an archaeology project. It is a game that I will upload to github after it is finished, but wanted to give you an early heads up. I will send a link after it is finished. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.16.119.5 (talk) 00:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi there,

I just wanted to say thank you for your AMC pacer photos. I used them in my blog, with credit, here https://automotivehistory.org/this-day-in-automotive-history/december-3-1979-the-last-amc-pacer-2/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9E20:B750:0:0:0:47 (talk) 20:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

How can I qualify my source reference for this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto_detailing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aslibradilla (talk • contribs) 06:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello Aslibradilla, All additions and corrections should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The problem with the auto detailing statements from that particular business is that the claims cannot be verified. In short, that spam site is not a reliable source. Appropriate sources can be things like books, magazine articles, web sites from reputable companies or organizations (not forums, promotional pages, or self-published personal sites). Cheers! CZmarlin (talk) 01:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.