User talk:CaptShayan

Helicopter shot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:408D:3C1A:E9A0:0:0:90C8:700D (talk) 09:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi CaptShayan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Thewikizoomer (talk) 05:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammad Saiful Alam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SUP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asim Jawad

The article Asim Jawad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sad event, but a
WP:BIO1E
without lasting notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

Fram (talk) 08:54, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Asim Jawad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asim Jawad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asim Jawad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 11:05, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kabir Ahmed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Military Secretary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Logged out editing

Hello

I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits or comments while logged out as seen in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aaaas216%26&diff=prev&oldid=1279309014] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Waker-Uz-Zaman&diff=prev&oldid=1278519110]. Note that WP:SOCK is a seriously violation and using to violate WP:NPA may result to be block from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Aaaas216& (talk) 20:21, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

was not me buddy. I wasnt using wikipedia for the last few days as I was travelling. CaptShayan (talk) 10:31, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I commented about the post nominal afterwards, no idea who commented before. But I do agree with that guy's statement to some extent. CaptShayan (talk) 10:33, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raj Mohan Vohra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Edward's School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Fazika

Hello CaptShayan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Battle of Fazika for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing it John. Have a great day! CaptShayan (talk) 20:07, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vijayant Thapar (officer)

Hello, CaptShayan,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Pppery and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started,

deletion review process

instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:43, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Vijayant Thapar (officer)

Hello CaptShayan, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Vijayant Thapar (officer), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijayant Thapar (officer).

Deletion

notability

, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:32, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:NOTE. CaptShayan (talk) 18:31, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

April 2025

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Indo-Pakistani war of 1947–1948, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:06, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to

contentious

. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the

administrators

have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable
policies and guidelines
;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from
gaming the system
.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

Cinderella157 (talk) 00:54, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of my edits contradicts these five points. I'm just curious why an editor suddenly reverted 5000 bytes without doing a consensus whereas you can see the talk page of the article that while adding these, it was discussed on the tp. ᶜᵒᶥᵒⁿᵉᶥ (talk) 06:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]