User talk:Cassavau

Me

Hi,

You have taken part in the AfD process for List of successful automobiles and voted delete. The decision was unanimous and the article was subsequently deleted. Now a corresponding article, List of automobiles that were commercial failures, is up for deletion for the same reasons. It would be only logicial and just to have them both deleted, so I cordially invite you to take part in the new discussion.

Regards, Bravada, talk - 09:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing to inform you, and many others, that an AfD in which you voted delete, List of automobiles that were commercial failures, was already unsucessfully nominated a short time ago, but under a different title. This was not noted in the nomination. Please read the opposing arguments here, and reconsider your vote, because it is important that the opinions of previous voters be considered. Thanks! AdamBiswanger1 23:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cassavau,

Thanks for your help with the Doc Chey's page! I added citations and a final paragraph about why Doc Chey's is one to watch in the industry. As I am not a restauranteur (only a fan) I will continue to seek out the industry news and views to improve the page. I have been a fan of the restaurant for several years now and have seen its expansion to North Carolina and beyond, and I strongly feel that the original owner's humanitiarian and holistic approach has driven its success even as it has become a chain.

Adriennefriend 15:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have added reasons for not deleting the Larry Walther article in the article's talk page.

Thanks,

Jayanta Sen 03:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, I was doing CSD patrol and when reading this article it stressed some importance. Notability is different from importance and I declined your request since it didn't fit under

Hi, I added

Sorry.  :) User:Zoe|(talk) 04:43, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for my barnstar! Sorry about the reversion races -- I know how annoying those are. Keep up the good work yourself, and let me know if I can help you out on patrol. Thanks again! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:08, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

G'day Cassavau,

you tagged Andrew Brockway as a candidate for speedy deletion recently. Your reasoning was, essentially, "candidates for the New York State Legislature fail A7". I'm afraid that's pretty much 100% wrong. Just thought I'd drop you a note, because I have actually deleted the article. In this case, it's because Mr Brockway's article failed AfD recently, and this version is rather similar to the deleted one. We do keep articles about candidates from time-to-time, so they aren't really speediable through A7. Happy editing! fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 09:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You said "Could you respond to my questions regarding cleanup on the Talk:Model_rocket talk page?" I looked and saw no questions-where are they? Troggulus 23:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At the top of the page- the heading Cleanup. It's moot now. The cleanup has been done and the tag removed. --Cassavau 20:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Fraternity/Sorority Barnstar
		For being apart of WikiProject Freemasonry! InvisibleDiplomat666 05:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For myself, & everybody else who wonders if the vandal patrol is worth it, my heartfelt thanx. I just wish more of the anons would get slapped down. From a 10 year old, I get it. From high school, or even adults... :/ Just don't keep him away entirely. We can use all the help we can get. ;D TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 02:23 & 02:24, 24 October 2009 (UTC) P.S. I never really expected a response....)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Cassavau! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Hi. The

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!