User talk:Ceejayoz

Please go to

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A {{

Contested. — ceejayoz ^talk 15:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your interest in keeping the article in good shape. First please note I would rather the article remain here in a correct form, rather than be deleted.

WP:VERIFY sums it up well : "Material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source." As it is at the moment I didn't see any such references, which is why I tagged the page, if you can address this concern by adding such references that would be great. If no such references can be found then perhaps the software is not yet well known enough to have an article here. Jackaranga 16:55, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I really like your custom userboxes! You should template them so people like me can easily use them (I didn't want to rip off your HTML directly). --Viper007Bond 11:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"There is nothing to indicate that Ric Romero has any internet fame on any site other than the one referred to"

Er, "Wrong."

http://www.ryanhurley.net/2006/08/i-might-be-pulling-ric-romero-with.html

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Ric+Romero

http://caltechgirlsworld.mu.nu/archives/127788.php

http://consumerist.com/consumer/obvious/-329512.php

http://blogging.la/archives/2005/10/romeros_so_cutting_edge_they_o.phtml

Or as Romero himself might have told the person who posted the "delete" request, "There's this new thing called 'Google' that lets you find information on the internet." <g>

(Come to think of it, the person who posted that might be Romero himself, in which case there's a 50/50 chance that he's actually never *heard* of Googl...) —Preceding unsigned comment added by JJSheridan522 (talk • contribs) 13:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

Ho Ceejayoz, thanks for the great image. You already uploaded the image to Wikimedia Commons, images on Commons can be used by all >700 Wikimedia projects. So no need to upload a local duplicate here on the english Wikipedia, files uploaded to the en.wikipedia can only be used here on this project. You should consider to upload files directly to Commons, sooner or later they will be transfered to Commons and deleted here. I tagged the file with {{

Thanks! Wasn't sure how to switch it over to the Commons version (I accidentally uploaded here first). — ceejayoz ^talk 18:16, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ceejayoz ...

I came across your user page while trawling Category:Pastafarian Wikipedians, and noticed that you currently reside in Ra-cha-cha ... I lived there from 1968-1982, and graduated from RIT with an AAS in Professional Photography, and then a Bachelors in System Software Science ... I worked in the Research Labs at Kodak for three years before I opened my own portrait studio ... after a few years, I closed up shop and went back to RIT for a new skill set, and then I spent six years pushing bits in the CAD/CAM department of Xerox.

Anywho, I have Fond Memories of my time in the Flower City (I miss the lilacs in spring, but not the harsh winters) ... this sandbox has a picture of me in Rochester from 1981. (I no longer edit as this username. :-)

Happy Editing! — 71.166.132.232 (talk · contribs) _{20:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

The article WEBrick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears NOT to meet notability criteria. Bordering advertising.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mootros (talk) 23:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is

). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of

talk) 19:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of WEBrick

The article WEBrick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the general notability guideline

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mootros (talk) 17:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith

Discussions of edits, such as one you posted here [[1]], should go on the article talk page, not the user's talk page. Please avoid accusations such as "misleading -- see

talk) 13:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Ceejayoz. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Ceejayoz. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ceejayoz. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ceejayoz. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alex Garden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Garden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Garden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sandstein 20:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Publify for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Publify is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Publify until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 08:24, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Publify for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Publify is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Publify (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 20:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Typo cms logo.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aeriks a-200.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]