User talk:Centurypr

Hello, and

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Howard Fine. Then you should do one of the following:

• Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the
  GFDL and state at Talk:Howard Fine
  where we can find that note; or
• Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the
  GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Howard Fine
  .

You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's

deletion policies at Howard Fine. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 22:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

An editor has nominated

The article Cheryl Woodcock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the

WP:GNG

. I cannot find any significant coverage of her at all. Note that the article was created by a paid editor (blocked) and then mostly expanded by two accounts belonging to someone who judging by one username (and some Google-fu) seems to have worked at Entertainment Tonight at the time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the