User talk:Cephal-odd

Welcome!

Hello, Cephal-odd, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Hi Cephal-Odd. I came across a page on the articles for creation list Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/2006-08-23 that is not yet reviewed. To my it seems a valid and worthwhile contribution to wikipedia. But I'm not an expert in this area. I see that you made a lot of contributions in this field. So perhaps you could look at it? The article is named Ellesmerocerida /Cephalopoda. thanks. Sander123 15:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You mentioned that you have references to demonstrate noteworthiness for the Summit Ave article- do you think you could discuss them on the articles for deletion page or add them to the article itself? when the discussion was going on for Nottingham Co-op we added a bunch of references and i think it helped the eventual decision to keep. Acornwithwings 06:10, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oh, nm i see you are doing that.  :) Acornwithwings 06:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion. Encouraged by the successful addition of documentation to the Nottingham article, I did add two more references to the Summit article. But in the end Summit arguably isn't as noteworthy a community center, since it hasn't hosted concerts or meetings of organizations. I'm glad things worked out for the Nottingham article, though. Cheers, Cephal-odd 15:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I didn't know about the article for creation list either. I stumbled across it when searching for info on orthoceras. I appears to be a list where unregistered users, who can't create pages yet can submit their pages until they are picked up by seasoned users. I guess you make it an article at the appropriate place and give credit in the edit summary, or on the discussion page. Thanks for picking it up! Bye Sander123 13:09, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you say that the shell of Tommotia is now considered to be a single sclerite, and that the original animal is believed to have had a whole suite of them, would it have looked something akin to Halkeriia or Orthrozanclus?--Mr Fink (talk) 18:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC) Nevermind! I have found a reconstruction [1] at Palaeos.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize in the long time in getting to this, but, what do you think of the inked version so far? [2] ?--Mr Fink (talk) 04:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If all goes according to schedule, I'll have Tommotia colored and ready to be re-uploaded this week.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know you mean well. Believe me, I do, because I just was doing this for several articles the other day until someone stopped me.

While it's very tempting, please don't simply add a fossil range. Even if a daughter taxon's article explicitly states the fossil record and cites it, you can't carry it to the parent article without citing the source.

What you can do: cite your source by adding a link, as here:

|fossil_range = [[Eocene]] - Recent [http://nowhere.nothing.com/some/address/here.pdf]

Remember that it's also important, even it it seems redundant, to put this information in the article somewhere. I usually create a subheader somewhere titled "Fossil record" and list the oldest known fossil (including the era) and the same with the newest, if appropriate. Also, mention what species this was. Be sure, again, to cite your source. If you cite it in the article, you don't need to cite it in the fossil_range.

Keep up the good work.

Happy tagging...Bob the Wikipedian (talk) 20:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, see my rambling reply at Talk:Orthrozanclus. Summary: the subject of the Halwaxiida is a mess; Conway Morris & Caron (2007) ssems to shift its ground (would not pass GA review!); precision about terms is not going to dispel the fog. --Philcha (talk) 06:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...for your help with the article anteater.

Good evening:

Please allow me to share an article with you. Maybe you will find it interesting:

http://www.naturapop.com/home/southern-limit-of-the-distribution-of-the-green-anaconda — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.2.207.74 (talk) 00:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Cephal-odd. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

so why have two taxoboxes with the same image in Giardia? Frietjes (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it by removing the species box. this article is about the genus, not one of the species. Frietjes (talk) 15:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I didn't mean to include two taxoboxes. Thanks for fixing it.Cephal-odd (talk) 19:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cephal-odd. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Probles, Cephal-odd!

Wikipedia editor SkyGazer 512 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this article! Could you add a taxobox to the article? Also, if you're able to, adding more sources to expand the information the article provides would be great.

To reply, leave a comment on SkyGazer 512's talk page.

Learn more about

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 22:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cephal-odd. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]