User talk:Chandrakantha.Mannadiar

Happy Onam

Hi Chandrakanth, wish you a very happy Onam. Axxn (talk) 07:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Menoky

I see you have reverted the entire content. I might have problems with my sourcing, but i am surprised that you have removed those with obvious references like the "Menokki ruler of Porallatiri" fact. Its all sourced from google books. you can search and verify. Pls verify each source and make partial reverts instead of complete reverts. thanks 117.201.241.23 (talk) 07:29, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken the freedom of adding the above mentioned point to the article. pls verify (see [1]) before any reverts. thanks 117.201.241.23 (talk) 07:34, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mysore affairs in Kerala

Wotcher,

Thanks for your interest in Mysore affairs in Kerala.

(Rameez pp (talk) 06:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Yeah.. and thanks for starting the article on the Mysore invasion. Chandrakantha.Mannadiar (talk) 18:17, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Need help

Wotcher,

The articles related (esp. Chera dynasty) are being destroyed by a user, please help me to make it as before. (Rameez pp (talk) 11:49, 26 April 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Need help

plz take a look at

Chera Dynasty. Axxn (talk) 17:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Nair

Please contribute. Please go through this list: User:Shannon1488/Sandbox Shannon1488 (talk) 15:27, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you were one of the first friends I made here. I have sent you one mail through wikimail. Hope we will keep in touch. Shannon1488 (talk) 17:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - ANI

[2] --CarTick (talk) 02:22, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Nair. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. "I think your mental balance is not good right now because of extreme anti-Nair hatred and caste fanaticism. You need to undergo a mental checkup." There is no excuse for that kind of language. Please step back before you get blocked for attacking other editors. Drmies (talk) 05:45, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You are getting close to breaching the

three revert rule at Nair

. I would remind you that it is possible to be held in technical breach, ie: even if the edits fall outside the 24 hour period. The matter is being discussed on the talk page, you have been involved in those discussions and even you admit that your source is not reliable. You are also aware that I have agreement from one "representative" of both sides of the argument to act as an informal mediator with regard to the validity of sources, and that the person whom represents your opinion is someone with whom you have had private communications also. In other words, they are not unknown to you.

Please do not revert again until the matter is settled on the talk page. Thank you. - Sitush (talk) 11:13, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent email

Got it. Don't worry about things: we all have our "moments". I'm not going to hold it against you and I doubt very much that User:MatthewVanitas will either.

Perhaps take a day or so off and then return? You will have calmed down, the project will still exist (hopefully!) and a simple "I'm sorry, I got a bit wound up" will really smooth the waters. You could strike through the offending message if you want, but the main thing is just to have a clear head. It is difficult sometimes, I know, to view articles in a dispassionate manner and this is one of the reasons why the conflict of interest advice exists for some things. I'm not saying that you should not edit the article or contribute to the talk page etc, but perhaps think twice about what you say and - as importantly - what other people say. Best wishes. - Sitush (talk) 20:16, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improve article

Can we improve the article Zamorin by adding more citation, and by an over-all coordination? This article also need an expert on the subject. Rameez pp (talk) 07:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rahul Nair

The article Rahul Nair has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Could not find significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG, junior officer so does not meet requirements of WP:SOLDIER

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dumelow (talk) 19:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]