User talk:Chimesmonster

Please don't sign like this. Thanks!

Improve] 07:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent edit to

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 07:52, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What you are doing is

There are enough books material here from which you can source your material. Remember to phrase it in such a way that your opinions/beliefs dont enter into the text and only you paraphrase what the references say.--Sodabottle (talk) 06:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"India's defeat in 1962 led to an overhaul of the Indian Army in terms of doctrine, training, organization and equipment. In the face of this ignominious war, Indians reacted with an unprecedented surge of patriotism."

"1962 war were influenced by strong emotions, including defiance, pride in the aroused patriotism and unity demonstrated ... In addition, there was an absolute conviction of the righteousness of India's cause"

These re covered in the article of that song i put up, aye mere watan ...., but the cabal of wikipedia it seems deigns otherwise. Do what you will.Vannakam. RAA Ra Ra your Boat (talk) 07:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The "cabal in wikipedia" merely asks you to put in the necessary work to make your edit stand upto wikipedia standards. If you prefer not to do the work necessary (sourcing it from reliable sources - wikipedia articles cant be used to source other articles), then no wonder your edits get reverted.--Sodabottle (talk) 07:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The wikipedia article has the relevant links , the data need not be reposted at every location!I provided the internal link for the same express purpose.instead I face , what i would call a group of people who do not believe in the authenticity of Wikipedia herself.

Refer the article , and before that , the posts I made with the people who raised the flag in the first instance (shovon et all) RAA Ra Ra your Boat (talk) 07:03, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have read your case at the Mediation Cabal

here. Please make your case comprehensible, and only then can a helpful editor have a look at it. Thanks. TheMike •^{Wassup doc?} 09:37, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tosha Thakkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tosha Thakkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of

Hello. I saw your request for mediation. It looks like administrator Spaceman Spiff is not available at the moment, having taken a break from Wikipedia. How may I help? Carrite (talk) 18:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A hello to you too , Since My request for mediation had spaceman Spiff as one of the respondents(parties to the conflict of interest) myself being the other , i do not see how you can interject on his behalf,sir/madam. However here goes,

I was unable to understand how quoting the lines spoken (unequivocally) by a living personality about a particular subject cannot be quoted as part of the article on him.When the living personality has himself Cleared his (low) opinion on that particular subject(in this case Hinduism and Hindu civilization) , what wrong did I do in Using that source.

Also , since the other party(spaceman spiff) stopped the debate/discussion unilaterally with a final word like "we are Done" and refused any further interaction , i had to resort to the mediation cabal.

If you can clarify , I would be honoured(yeah ,I am an Indian and a Hindu).I apologise for the delay in responding. RAA Ra Ra your Boat (talk) 07:22, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My discussion with Spaceman spiff can be found hereRAA Ra Ra your Boat (talk) 07:32, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Chimesmonster: Hi there! I'd like to let you know that in a Mediation Cabal mediation case that you are involved in, or have some connection with:

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-02-01/Ramachandra Guha

I've made the following changes:

This case that you filed appears to relate to the same issue(s) as 2011-02-26/Ambarish Srivastava. It has been sitting around since 01 February 2011. SpacemanSpiff appears inactive; is mediation still required? Let me know whether there is a current dispute or not. I have left him a talk page message.

Please have a look at the mediation case page linked to above, and participate in the current stage of the mediation process if you wish. Of course, participation is completely optional, and if you don't want to take part in this mediation at any point, that's totally fine. If you have any questions or concerns relating to this dispute, the mediation, or the Mediation Cabal in general, please do let me know. Thank you very much. Best regards,

Dear Chimesmonster: Hi there! I'd like to let you know that in a Mediation Cabal mediation case that you are involved in, or have some connection with:

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-02-01/Ramachandra Guha

I've made the following changes:

Your case has been closed, because mediation has been declined by SpacemanSpiff (talk · contribs).

Please have a look at the mediation case page linked to above, and participate in the current stage of the mediation process if you wish. Of course, participation is completely optional, and if you don't want to take part in this mediation at any point, that's totally fine. If you have any questions or concerns relating to this dispute, the mediation, or the Mediation Cabal in general, please do let me know. Thank you very much. Best regards,

Mediation on Wikipedia is voluntary, which means that mediation will only proceed if the major parties in the dispute agree to undertake mediation.

(talk) 13:00, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The article Kerala nakshatra signs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTDIR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 08:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shanti Bhushan.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

1. Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Chimesmonster. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Again, welcome!
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 13:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( in the enhanced toolbar, or if you use the old "classic" toolbar) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 13:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chimesmonster. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]