User talk:Chrisvls

Hello, and

to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

22:39, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Re: 163.1.141.7 has returned

He doesn't own that page. No anonymous user does: anyone could have that IP address. I've rolled back. Besides which, other admins need to know the damage he has done in the past. Thanks for letting me know! His page and Rhwanda's page are both on my watchlist, I'll know if he tries it again. - Ta bu shi da yu 07:13, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

That's fine chris. But so far I don't see anybody else contributing and the essay doesn't make much sense with out the parts you took out maybe you should remove the whole thing and return it to the orignal which was just a stub. only a suggestion. I am way ahead of you and have started a blog no more wikipedia.

Sincerely Terry Mockler

Thanks, Terry. Maybe a stub does make sense, I was hoping to have folks start on an outline, but no interest to date. Best luck with the blog, you are way ahead of us . . . Cheers. Chris vLS 00:45, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

A while ago you contacted me about an article I'd written about

's novels, and how there was no page on the author or books. Just thought you might be interested to know that I have added pages for the author and am working on the novels.

Thanks, Martin Ultima

issues about school articles

In November 2003, there was a VfD debate over

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Sunset High School (Portland)

.

I am writing to you because you have participated in such debates before. There still does not exist a wikipedia policy (as far as i can tell) over what to do in regards to articles about specific U.S. public school. My hope is that a real consensus can come out of the debate, and a real policy can take shape. Take part if you are so willing. Kingturtle 02:33, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your input re E Clampus Vitus.

My pleasure. Anything for the widows and orphans. ;-) Chris vLS 22:48, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

You live! Herostratus 16:18, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sure, every good editor is missed! I was checking edit history of users on a page I'm watching, and there you were, gone since October but popping back for one edit, so, hey, welcome back! Herostratus 22:24, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Chrisvls! My name's Joe Sutherland, and I work with the Communications team at the Wikimedia Foundation. I am writing an article for the Wikimedia Blog about the article on the recent Zika virus outbreak and how it has been updated as news has developed. Since you're interested in this topic and have edited the article a fair bit, I was wondering if you could answer some questions for use in the blogpost?

Specifically, I want to ask:

1. What made you interested in this topic?
2. How did you get interested in editing Wikipedia articles?
3. What do you think of Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics? How could it be improved?
4. Why is it important that Wikipedia's articles on breaking epidemics like this are kept up-to-date?

I'm writing here because it looks like you have email disabled. If you want to email me your answers (or have questions yourself!) you can do so at jsutherlandwikimedia.org ! I've already been in touch with some other editors of the article but would love your input!

Thanks a lot for your time! Joe Sutherland (WMF) (talk) 01:28, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This individual is a woman, and her name is "Melissa". Her delusions and mental illnesses notwithstanding, her name is "Melissa". That is what will be put back in the article and continue to do so, until wikipedia learns to accept the facts.

I am not expecting, nor will I receive any responses to this matter. Her name is "Melissa", simple as that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.96.45.127 (talk) 20:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you feel your point of view trumps the way wikipedia works. If everyone did that, wikipedia wouldn't work very well. I'm afraid I'll have to refer this to administrators to address. Chris vLS (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No no, it isn't my point of view, it is the opinion of our Lord and Saviour, and the words of his book. A person cannot mutilate their gender away, we call this mental illness. It's a shame you reject this fact in favour of leftist lunacy. Consensus is dead. The Lord reigns supreme, and the truth cannot be eliminated. You also seem to have an issue reading. When I said "no discussion", I meant that. I think the words I used made that perfectly clear. For your benefit, you can play around with "consensus" all day long, but you cannot and will not attempt to alter truth. Re-read the bit where I make clear no replies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.96.45.127 (talk) 21:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you see God's law overriding the need for consensus. But that's not how wikipedia works. Wikipedia isn't yours, or mine for that matter. Editing is a volunteer effort. For people who volunteer to do editing here, it entails respecting way wikipedia works -- the same way that volunteering at a church or hospital entails respecting that church or hospital's views and rules. Cheers. Chris vLS (talk) 23:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, why did you revert my grammar-correction edit to the above? Denisarona (talk) 07:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because I'm an idiot? I picked the change up off pending changes, was just looking at the diff, and mistook it for changing his son's name to Frederick Trumpf. So sorry! Chris vLS (talk) 07:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're not an idiot and I wasn't implying such. As I said on my talk page, no problem. Regards Denisarona (talk) 12:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, you weren't implying anything, was just trying to be funny. Thanks again. Chris vLS (talk) 16:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	原星章
	Thanks for warning THSQ6 Aaa839 (talk) 08:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Aaa839! Chris vLS (talk) 23:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Singapore. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completed 01:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC). Thanks, Legobot! Chris vLS (talk) 16:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result was: no consensus. Probably a dysfunctional editing dynamic at the moment. Chris vLS (talk) 21:13, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Clinton Foundation. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completed 19:20, 7 November 2016 (UTC). Thanks, Legobot! Chris vLS (talk) 16:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, no consensus. Again, a difficult dynamic with tow proposals far apart, making a middle path harder to find. Chris vLS (talk) 23:51, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completed 11 November 2016 (UTC). Thanks, Legobot! Chris vLS (talk) 16:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result was to restore deleted content. My vote was to restore deleted content. Chris vLS (talk) 23:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Neoliberalism. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completed. 23:48, 13 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks, Legobot! Chris vLS (talk) 23:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result was to remove material from lede. My vote was to remove material from lede. Chris vLS (talk) 01:12, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

Completed 16:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks Legobot! Chris vLS (talk) 16:33, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The decision was to keep all of the charts. My votes was that they were valid, but I suggested improving or removing two of them. I should have been clearer that the charts in question weren't helpful and should be removed unless improved. Chris vLS (talk) 00:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:MPay. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completed 16:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC). Thanks Legobot! Chris vLS (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decision was to merge. I voted 'mild support for merge.' Consensus was pretty clear, actually. Chris vLS (talk) 00:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:South West Trains. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Chris vLS (talk) 20:13, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michael Portillo. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done 07:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC). Thanks Legobot! Chris vLS (talk) 07:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Volunteer (Ireland). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completed 20:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC). Thanks Legobot! Chris vLS (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rodrigo Duterte. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completed 19:54, 26 November 2016 (UTC). Thanks, Legobot!Chris vLS (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

Completed 04:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC). Thanks, Legobot! Chris vLS (talk) 04:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:California. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commented a while ago, but now have voted. Thanks, Legobot! Chris vLS (talk) 05:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:North Korea. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completed. 23:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC) Thanks Legobot! Chris vLS (talk) 06:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Steve Bannon. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completed 06:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC). Thanks, Legotbot! Chris vLS (talk) 06:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

Completed 05:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC). Thanks, Legobot! Chris vLS (talk) 05:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was not allowed to respond in the talk page some error came up what I had said was that the page was misleading and one sided. Creep Catchers are not a non for profit organization they are not registered anywhere, there is no physical location or business associated with it, there whois information is either private or falsified one is for a rowing company in Edmonton and most use false names. They have been involved in illegal activity as outline by one of my sources and many have been charged with other crimes. They lied about their involvement with police. I only added or corrected information gathered from legitimate news sources. Please helpTruthitmatters (talk) 04:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC) I thought I made the required edits to conform and legitimize my edits but once done was immediatedly reverted again maybe I tried to post to the wrong place as I tried the creepcatcher talk pageTruthitmatters (talk) 04:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC) Thank you for your feedback I will find additional sources, the internet vigilant group was cited at the bottom of the pages there other sources as well where would I find the initial author to find their sources? I do not think much of this page is based on truth or valid sourcesTruthitmatters (talk) 11:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did not add that he finished in 5th, all I did was put a period and "the". From, Tybomb124. Tybomb124 (talk) 23:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that! I thought you had added that he had won the trophy to the infobox. My apologies. Chris vLS (talk) 01:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Math Xx236 (talk) 07:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! Thanks,Xx236! Chris vLS (talk) 07:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Silicon Alley. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completed. Chris vLS (talk) 19:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out! I've left you a reply on my talk page. JustBerry (talk) 15:46, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're fast, man. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:243:8200:82FC:8005:4ADF:C94E:D19 (talk) 22:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Also, it is true, just for your knowledge, so okay man? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:243:8200:82FC:8005:4ADF:C94E:D19 (talk) 23:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vladimir Putin. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the previous discussion you were involved in regarding Donald Trump's infobox has closed and there is a new one underway which may interest you. 80.235.147.186 (talk) 01:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comments on modification to the page. User Amost42n81 is a COI, User only edits two pages, Kevin O'Leary and Connor O'Brien, which are related. User adds information which is not referenced, Chemical Bank, positions, links to Corporate websites or linkedin pages. Amost42n81 modifications to Stanton International Equity and the Stanton Diversified Strategies funds were clearly COI.

• The original citation was from a national newspaper Globe and Mail
• The comments inserted by Amost42n81, are quotes from O'Brien, which are not backed in the article.
• The link referenced by Amost42n81 www.stantonasset.com which has no data to backup the citation, and is a corporate biased website.
• The comment that "some investors losing as much as 70% of their money" is simply impossible and misleading. A fund is a single entity, either everyone loses 70%, or no one does. It is impossible that only some do.

66.119.135.6 (talk) 23:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, 66.119.135.6, I'll take a closer look. Cheers. Chris vLS (talk) 23:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I reverted before I saw your thanks. Please modify as you see best 66.119.135.6 (talk) 23:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, 66.119.135.6! I wrote the following before I saw your response to my response ;)

I only reverted one revert, here [1]. After reviewing the source, the Almost42n81 sentence still seems supported by the source ond more encyclopedic in tone. To address your four points:

• The Globe and Mail source is still in the article.
• The only additional information is the claim of 30 percent returns. The Globe and Mail quoted this number with no contradicting information, even though clearly they were talking to a source that would have that information. If there was another side to the story, I would expect it to have been in the Globe and Mail piece. One could add an "according to O'Brien", but it seems a reasonable use of the source to me.
• I didn't re-add the Stanton source, but I would agree, it doesn't add anything here.
• I think your claim that everyone loses the same percentage is a little hasty. If investors invest at different times and buy in at different prices, they will lose different percentage amounts, even though they are, as you point out, offered the same price. If investor A buys in 1940 at $50, and investor B buys in 1941 at $100, and in 1942 the fund collapses to $25, then investor A has lost 50% of their money and investor B has lost 75% of their money -- even though they both are at the same price $25. It is true that from 1941 to 1942 it was down 75 percent for the year for both investors, only one of them lost 75 percent of their money.
• This is why the source explicitly says: "Investors who had bought in 2007 or 2008 lost up to 70% of their money." Taking the "some investors" or "up to 70" qualifiers out of the wikipedia article is not supported by the source.

I guess I would add:

• "Significant losses" and "up to 70 percent" is better than "blew up" for the encyclopedic voice and NPOV.
• While the source says that leverage "amplified losses," that is true of even small amounts of leverage. I don't see support in the source for describing this fund as excessively leveraged.
• I don't see anything in this source supporting a discussion of fees.
• "massive losses amplified by the fund’s use of leverage" is copy and pasted and should be re-written, per COPYVIO.

I will add this to the talk page. Looks like you've made some changes, I'll take a look before I decide whether to restore. Thanks. Chris vLS (talk) 00:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emmett Till. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Edinburgh Central (Scottish Parliament constituency). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:YouTube. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Straight-through processing. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Baraboo High School. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:United Kingdom in the European Union. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zodiac Seats U.S.. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette aerosol and liquid. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus for merge and the title will be changed soon. QuackGuru (talk) 21:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge completed and title changed. QuackGuru (talk) 17:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:American International Group. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

Please comment on

Talk:Electric smoking system

The

]

Please comment on

Talk:Electric smoking system

The

]

Please comment on

Talk:ABSA Group Limited

The

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Brexit note. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:American International Group. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of northernmost items. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:GWR Records. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tax haven. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rent regulation. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rent regulation. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Raiffeisen Zentralbank. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Thank U, Next. Legobot (talk) 04:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White genocide conspiracy theory. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gab (social network). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fascism. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Federal Assault Weapons Ban. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Achziv. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The World Factbook list of developed countries. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gender feminism. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Canadian law. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ilhan Omar. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Asia topic. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Immigration and crime in Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Culture of the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

Please comment on

Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party

The

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Pell. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:People's Party of Canada. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Republic of China (1912–1949). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Romania. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:SNC-Lavalin affair. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donors Trust. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Swedes. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Germanic peoples. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

Girl Scout Cookies

How are you? North8000, btphelps, and I have continued to collaborate on the Girl Scout Cookies article. I wanted to reach out to you directly to invite you to continue the collaboration. Are you still interested? I hope you're doing well.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 21:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Civil Rights Act of 1968. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fascism in Europe. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Achilleas Kallakis

Please comment on the discussion regarding the use of the term "right libertarian" to describe libertarians that do not oppose free markets, and that do not make a clear distinction between laissez-faire capitalism and advocacy of free markets. This discussion can be found on the talk page for the Libertarianism article. The term is primarily used in a derogatory way and by self-described "left-libertarians". The individuals described in that article, and in the poorly-titled right-libertarianism article do not typically identify with the political right - or the political for that matter. JLMadrigal @ 14:00, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply