discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Khoikhoi 20:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Çamlıhemşin
Information on Wikipedia is based on
WP:V. Therefore, you cannot remove information if it is based on a reliable source simply because you think it's false. Please read-up on these two policies, thanks. Khoikhoi 20:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Hi. What specific parts of the
fact}} tags to the specific sentences that you dispute. I have contacted the author of the article to add sources. Khoikhoi 19:36, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
I have placed an explanation to the discssion page of the Article...Basically Tiltle, Text and Source do not match with each other. I think it's a messCihsai (talk) 21:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wholesale Revert in Hemshin peoples
Hi, I notice you are taking an interest in the Hemshin peoples entry. It looks like user Eupator has engaged in yet another wholesale revert. I have put a warning to Eupator’s page and also informed relevant admin.Omer182 (talk) 20:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
User talk pages
Don't revert users on their own talk pages, as you just did to Eupator. Users may delete warnings; this confirms that they have seen the warning, which is a good thing. Also, don't make ad hominem comments. Your admonishment to Eupator was rude and provacative. JehochmanTalk 13:04, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
February 2013
Your recent editing history at
reverts
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
WP:ARBAA2 arbitration case, which I can explain if you are curious. If you don't choose to respond, you'll probably be getting a formal warning under that case. Trying to force your point of view into the article by reverting is unlikely to work in any article that is subject to arbitration. You need to have reasons and you need to persuade the other editors. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:44, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Please carefully read the following notice:
The Arbitration Committee authorises Wikipedia administrators to impose sanctions on editors who edit pages relating to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Blocks, bans on reverting edits, bans from the entire topic area, or other sanctions may be imposed for disruptive edits to pages relating to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts.
Before making any more edits to this topic area, please familiarise yourself with the
discretionary sanctions system. The arbitration decision affecting edits to this topic can be read here
. I will record on the arbitration case decision page that you have been given this notice. You are now formally aware discretionary sanctions have been authorised and can be imposed with no further warning. Please do not hesitate to contact me or any other editor if you have any questions.
Your claim that consensus was reached to remove mention of Armenians from the lead of
Hemshin peoples has no visible support. If you continue to try forcing your POV into the article you may be sanctioned. This warning is being logged in the arbitration case. EdJohnston (talk) 00:01, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
WP:Arbitration enforcement or to the Arbitration committee. Let me know if you have any questions. EdJohnston (talk) 04:34, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
