User talk:Citytaker

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Editor D.S (talk) 04:39, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for obvious sock, clearly here to disrupt.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 05:33, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Citytaker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a sock. I notice there's been no researching against me nor any proof of how I'm a sock. I have reverted Capitals00 once and complained suspected coordination with other editors. I have right to complain if I see something against the rules happening. I did read the history of the Ogaden War where I reverted him. How is that socking? Citytaker (talk) 05:38, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sitush sums it up perfectly. Declined. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:30, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Spaceman I'm not socking. You cannot block me simply because you think so. I have interacted with Capitals00 only once, so how am I socking? Is it a crime to report unusual coordination between a group of editors if you see it and demand an investigation? Citytaker (talk) 05:41, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• You have come from nowhere, made one article edit and then run off to ANI and canvassed various people who commented at a recent arbitration-related discussion. You're not new here. - Sitush (talk) 05:42, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a crime to notice the odd coordination when reading through history of an article? I wasn't born yesterday, though I must say I haven't been here much long. Citytaker (talk) 05:44, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am speaking the truth Sitush (talk). I invited others because I can't investigate it by myself. Citytaker (talk) 05:46, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Much long"? That's a very Indo-Pakistani use of English. And the history of the article shows little that would give rise to your jump to ANI. - Sitush (talk) 05:48, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should I stop speaking some words? I did notice the coordination. That's why I complained. I am speaking the truth! Oh and why haven't you ever bothered to investigate if you really believe I'm a sock of Wikiexplorer13? This is BS. Citytaker (talk) 05:50, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have not said you are a sock of Wikiexplorer13. - Sitush (talk) 05:51, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My complaint is about being sock of Wikiexplorer13. You did say I am not a new user though. Citytaker (talk) 05:54, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will someone stop Capitals00 removing my comment at sock investigation - [1]. I have a right to defend myself in a complaint! WHo is he to remove it? Citytaker (talk) 05:55, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you restore my comment at Sock investigation Sitush (talk)? I have a right to defend myself and Capitals00 removed my comments.[2] He is being a vigilante. Citytaker (talk) 05:59, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sitush (talk), Capitals00 has again struck my report and hidden it this time. [3]. He is deliberately edit-warring. Please stop him. Citytaker (talk) 06:07, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have not made any disruptive edit Sitush (talk). I made a legitimate report on possible coordination and it should be kept open. He has also deleted the header of the report. Citytaker (talk) 06:09, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spaceman I'm not a sock. Citytaker (talk) 06:11, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:NeilN I'm not a sock, i just interacted with Capitals00 once. Please don't close my complaint and let it be investigated. Citytaker (talk) 06:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:NeilN Please don't close my complaint! Citytaker (talk) 06:20, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]