User talk:Clarinetcousin

Hello, Clarinetcousin, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

]

Clarinetcousin, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Clarinetcousin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Consider this a warning.

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. --Guiletheme (talk) 04:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are right I am sorry I am passionate about this elections and independent candidates, I know it may look like I support De La Fuente but is not true is just that I am trying to give all of them the same chance of being seen, Castle, McMullin, Kotilkoff, Stein, Johnson, . Please check the last comment I made on the talk page and if you like it support me and if you don´t... don´t say anything against it, hahaha I am joking. Sorry if you got offended I know you are a huge fan of Wikipedia.

(

wp:ping. It can be tricky. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Ping is how you can notify others to your reply. No knowledge or opinion on your actions. Jim1138 (talk) 02:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.

]

Notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The

discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here

.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:02, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you threatening me? How is adding two candidates that meet the 270 consensus wrong?

This isn't in any way a threat, just a notice to inform you of editing restrictions at

WP:1RR). This isn't just you but for all editors that edit that page. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 12:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

This is a threat because I made a change you don´t want to make so you send me that. The ones who undo the content are the ones who delete it. It makes no sense, for you to take it out. Why do you want to keep them out?

You are free to disagree, all I am saying is to keep

WP:1RR in mind. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:35, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Agreed please dont violate

WP:1RR anymore. No one is threatening. Just wait 24 hours and you can readd whatever you please. You're content has been challenged though so spend more time in talk page than you do editing so you can defend you're case. As a new editor myself I've had to learn this and im still working on it. So just keep this is mind. Thanks LuckyLag360 (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Prcc27🌍 (talk) 18:04, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don´t care you are the ones who are doing it for just the sake of doing it. You are the one who needs to stop.

October 2016

United States presidential election, 2016. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Huon (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Rocky De La Fuente

If you read through

Talk:United States presidential election, 2016#Request for clear consensus regarding the infobox (4, 6, or 8 candidates?). If you have anything to add, please add it there instead of creating new sections. clpo13_(talk) 17:41, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply

]