User talk:Cmedinger

This user is a member of the Roller Coaster task force of the Amusement Parks Project.

This user is a member of WikiProject Amusement Parks.

Is there a reason you reverted my revert on this article? Gemini has two lift hills. Stratosphere ^{(U T)} 18:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that its two separate tracks, but it is a single ride. It's not Gemini Blue and Gemini Red. The fact that Cedar Point themselves refers to it having two lifts also lends credence to my statement. Either way I'm not terribly concerned, but this might be something to bring up on the

WP:ROCO talk to get further discussion. Stratosphere ^{(U T)} 23:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I have sent a message to User:IronGargoyle, whom is a administrator here, asking for his help. My assessment of the issue is it falls in the gray area between simple vandalism and the Three-revert rule. I can tell you that the blocks for Anon. IP users usually don't last to long.--Coaster1983 (talk) 22:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested semi-protection for the page. It might be a good idea to get away from Wikipedia for awhile and then discuss the issue on the article's talk page later. Coaster1983 (talk) 17:03, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection.--Coaster1983 (talk) 17:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- You make a good point, because Cedar Point, Indiana, is quite insignificant. I just did a search on "Cedar Point", however, and found numerous other articles with that name in the title that could be mistakenly linked to the amusement park (and probably some already are). What I'll do is create a disambiguation page and place a link to it at the top of the Cedar Point article. This is standard practice for just about any popular name in Wikipedia. Cheers, --Ken Gallager (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If there are sources to be found, and the info can be written in an encyclopedic tone, I would have no problem with it. The anon editor is presenting some very specific facts that I doubt he knows with 100% certainty, and the phrase "it is wondered why" these rules are in place sounds like an individual with an axe to grind. Lambertman (talk) 17:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that states those rules are generally followed. However, it's not exactly a trade secret, and I'm sure all parks have some sort of similar policy, so I don't really think it's notable for inclusion on this article - again, I'm leaning towards "axe to grind". Lambertman (talk) 13:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dario Franchitti was in the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series this year in the Chip Ganassi Racing #40 car and tried to race. The story is relivant to NASCAR as he tried to race in the series before his injury and his team shutting down. This is the same team David Stemme was on before he lost his ride to Franchitti in the off season; hence it is important that every story is covered. If you want to make something of it, I suggest you seek out a moderator to settle this. NoseNuggets (talk) 6:28 PM US EDT Sept 3 2008.

I do not want an edit war on these pages. All news in NASCAR is covered on a weekly basis within each week's race. That's a rule of thumb on these stories. If you continue to rvert to nonsensical edits that you think do not concern NASCAR or "silly season", then and only then will I report you to a moderator for vandalism. If you think that I'm joking, take a look at all the other race pages for 2008, we covered announcements on there of all driver changes and the closing of Chip Ganassi's #40 team where Dario Franchitti was employed before July 1st, and if that isn't relevant, start your own pages! NoseNuggets (talk) 7:57 PM US EDT Sept 3 2008

And by the way, you do not have to put both the city and state, just "Richmond", and I added "The Commonwealth's capital city" outside the link like this: "((Richmond, Virginia|Richmond)), the Commonwealth's capital city" but bracketed. NoseNuggets (talk) 8:21 US EDT Sept 3, 2008.

Please put it in the

he uses both ip addresses 12.208.229.160 and 12.208.229.80 and he continualy vandalises the page for Elliott Sadler--Cmedinger (talk) 15:29, 26 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmedinger (talk • contribs) [reply]

While I'm happy to answer questions, it looks like your question could have been answered and resolved more quickly if you had used my

message wizard

. It's linked as "Talk" after my name and at the top of my talk page. Why not try it next time?

I have issued the user a warning for vandalism. If he continues to vandalise, use further warnings from

talk) 15:31, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Hey there Cmedinger, I'm not sure if you intended to transclude a yet to be created rfa, but this diff shows you adding a nomination of yourself that hasn't been created yet. If you need help, please let me know how I can help you! Cheers, Keeper ǀ 76 20:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got your message. I'm glad to help. You'll notice first that

not now. Don't be discouraged, just keep doing what you like to do on Wikipedia. The best way to pass through RFA successfully is to wait patiently for someone else to nominate you. Meanwhile, continue your good work, make the articles better articles, stay out of trouble, and soon enough, you'll get noticed! Happy editing, Keeper ǀ 76 20:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The key is patience my friend, and don't be discouraged. Keeper ǀ 76 21:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are here to discuss the article, not for you to give you opinion on how this driver would be faster if... There's a warning template for it at Template:Uw-chat1, but I decided to talk with you instead because it's considered poor form to give a template warning to regular contributor. That comment attempting to start a forum needs to be deleted because others will pick up on it and start commenting back to you. Things go out of control from there. Your comment doesn't help improve the article at all. Royalbroil 16:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you were to find a source which made this statement, I don't see how it belongs in the article. It's definitely someone's opinion, controversial, and looking at

Wikipedia:TALK#How_to_use_article_talk_pages's Keep on topic bullet for the guideline. Cheers! Royalbroil 20:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Before making accusations of removing others pictures just to substitute with my own, you should check your facts as this is untrue. Specifically with the Maverick revision, all of the original pictures were kept, but moved to a gallery section where they are better suited where my pictures were also located. In fact, this is what you are doing by reversing perfectly acceptable edits so that your pictures are the only ones shown. A proper revision would be a restoration of my images, with your original images also included. A complete revert is completely unnecessary. (Coasterman1234 (talk) 03:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

In the same respect, remember you do not have full authority over an article, and do not have the right to completely revert acceptable edits. If you felt there were too many pictures, then a revision with a removal of some pictures could have been done, rather than a full revert. You are not the only editor, nor the only photographer either. (Coasterman1234 (talk) 03:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for uploading

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright

infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:34, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amusement Park WikiProject

Hello Cmedinger. Recently, the

Walt Disney World) were also revived and have now become part of the Amusement Park WikiProject as task forces. If you would like to remain listed as a member on these WikiProjects please re-add your name to the appropriate lists at the participants page. All names currently on the list have been cleared. If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Thank you for your cooperation, Themeparkgc  Talk  08:18, 6 November 2010 (UTC).[reply

]

Future of WikiProject Amusement Parks

Hi Cmedinger. I am contacting you because you are listed as one of members of WikiProject Amusement Parks or one of its task forces. I have just started a discussion on the project's talk page regarding the future of the project. I have made four proposals and I would appreciate your comments on them. Thank you Themeparkgc  Talk  23:14, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Amusement Park Quarter 2, 2013 Newsletter

	WikiProject Amusement Parks Newsletter Quarter 2, 2013	581	147	5.16	49	18.2%	» Full edition
		Unassessed Articles	Coordinates Needed	WikiWork Load	Project Members	B&M articles are GA

21:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

• File:Top thrill dragster.jpg
• File:Halloweekends.JPG

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see

Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:26, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

WikiProject Amusement Park Quarter 3, 2013 Newsletter

	WikiProject Amusement Parks Newsletter Quarter 3, 2013	463	124	5.13	50	30%	» Full edition
		Unassessed Articles	Coordinates Needed	WikiWork Load	Project Members	B&M articles are GA or FA

--EdwardsBot (talk) 20:53, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Amusement Park Newsletter Special (July 2013)

WikiProject Amusement Parks Newsletter Volume 1, Issue 3 July 2013 Special

Project News An interview involving this WikiProject will be featured in the Signpost's WikiProject Report on August 28, 2013. If there are any members who wish to take part in the interview, please go here to answer the questions. For members that use VisualEditor, as of the newsletter publishing date, most of the WikiProject's infoboxs and templates have very limited interaction with the editor. Over the next few months, code to allow full interaction with VisualEditor will be written. Currently, {{Infobox amusement park}} and {{Infobox attraction}} have code written but {{Infobox amusement park}} is not being actively used as VisualEditor has not noticed that the code is there, yet ({{Infobox attraction}} is working). Editor: Dom497 Sent out on July 18, 2013.

WikiProject Amusement Parks Article Clean-Up

Recently, an issue has been brought up regarding the notability of many articles within WikiProject Amusement Parks. As a result, a page has been created regarding this issue as well as a possible solution (which will be on-going). In a nut-shell, certain articles will be picked to be reviewed in each stage and the WikiProject members (you) will decide if the article should be deleted or kept based on Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

I hoping this will work and if it doesn't, oh well...I tried.

More info can be found on the linked page above.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 21 March 2014 (UTC) Sent by Dom497[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

WikiProject Amusement Park notification

There are recently-posted discussions at WikiProject Amusement Parks you may be interested in contributing to, located here: WT:WikiProject Amusement Parks. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You are receiving this notification, because you are listed as a participant of WikiProject Amusement Parks.

WikiProject status request

Hi there! Hope you are doing well! WikiProject Amusement Parks is going through some updates, and in the process, we are identifying members that are still active.

If you'd like to remain in the list of participants, please visit the page and change {{unknown}} to {{active}} in the chart for your username. After 90 days, all editors with "unknown" status will be moved to the inactive list automatically.
If you'd like to stop receiving these notifications, simply remove your name from the page. Thank you! --GoneIn60 (talk) 23:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You are receiving this notification, because you are listed as a participant of WikiProject Amusement Parks.