User talk:CoffeePro567

It's between God and me.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Vandalism, March 5, The Bye Bye Man, The Emoji Movie, July 28, etc.

What a shame; it's clear you've actually at times made competent, valuable, and constructive contributions to some pages at times (especially some about musicals), but your destructive and incessant behavior of vandalism is childish and immature, and a waste of your time. This is your last warning. Please stop your vandalism. If you're actually willing to help with this encyclopedia, which prides itself in anyone being able to edit, then shape up and stop vandalizing it. If not, there's no reason we have not to ban you from further making unconstructive, unhelpful, vandalizing edits like you have shown to do recently. Hope you make a good choice. We know people can change, and we hope you're willing to. Good day. Paintspot Infez (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CoffeePro567 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't want to be unblocked. I just wanted to say that George Washington was played by Isaiah Johnson in the Off-Broadway production of Hamilton, not Chris Johnson. CoffeePro567 (talk) 00:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have editing privileges on this page only to request unblocking. If you abuse the privileges, you will lose them. —C.Fred (talk) 00:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CoffeePro567 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. I have decided to come back to Wikipedia. I have remembered my block and thought to myself "what a stupid experiment". "Experiment" in this case means that it was to see if the blocking actually worked. I now have the intention to help, and if you'd let me in, that'd be great. CoffeePro567 (talk) 18:42, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, I don't believe that explanation. Any reasonable person who wanted to see if blocking actually worked (never mind that we block lots of accounts, and it works for them) would ask an administrator to be blocked for a limited time as a test. They wouldn't go on a vandalism spree. Huon (talk) 20:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is it that you intend to do on Wikipedia if unblocked? How can we be assured that this is not another experiment and that you will not experiment in the future? 331dot (talk) 19:37, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment See

WP:BLOCKME Bobherry Talk Edits 12:59, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Parting phrase has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the
  introduction
  .
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Parting phrase was changed by CoffeePro567 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87083 on 2018-02-18T00:24:08+00:00 .

Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at March 5. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the
  block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism
  .
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: March 5 was changed by CoffeePro567 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9404 on 2018-02-18T00:26:11+00:00 .

Thank you.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 00:38, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Joust!: A Mighty Medieval Musical Blue Riband► 13:48, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]