User talk:CoolKatt number 99999/Archive 4
If you are going to leave rude messages, then do not leave any at all -- CoolKatt number 99999.
Get some experience
If this user attempts to edit or request page deletion then ignore it. This one who has several usernames on wikipedia likes everything nice and neat under his own umbrella of speculation. Just check the oddball mergers past the infinate list of pop bands.
Another new start
I know the drill... CoolKatt number 99999 16:13, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Hello. Please remember to always provide an
- P.S. Thanks for fixing the table at TheJabberwock 14:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)]
Speculation
Will you please stop adding speculation and/or possible predicitons an outcomes to articles,
- Answer, read the poilcy or get reverted. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 06:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)]
Sorry
Apparently you can't protect your talk page. You really need to start replying to your messages and stop ignoring them. CFIF (talk to me) 12:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
TV sub-pages
I like to make this stuff up... CoolKatt number 99999 04:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- WHY? This doesn't show up on Google, does it? If it does, I recommend you place some sort of tag on it. I'd hope people wouldn't be confused by fake articles.--Firsfron 05:13, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
The Shield
Your change to the page
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kafziel 02:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Please Stop
Changing the category titles on TV stations. --CFIF (talk to me) 00:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Regarding call sign meanings
I don't think the W at the beginning of most call signs means "We're". I know in most cases it makes sense, but still, if there is a K at the beginning of the call sign, it doesn't mean anything either. -
AfD simpson list
At the Afd page for List of TV channels that air The Simpsons, please state a reason to keep.
And why shouldn't we edit this page? How do we leave comments then? --
- That was just a test about no messages CoolKatt number 99999 10:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
MfD Notice
Your sub pages have been put up for deletion here. --CFIF (talk to me) 20:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Sorry it's had to come to this
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/CoolKatt number 99999. --CFIF (talk to me) 21:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Help
User:CFIF keeps being uncivil to me. Please help me? CoolKatt number 99999 21:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- You're going to have to be more specific. —David Levy 21:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)]
- Read his recent edits please. CoolKatt number 99999 21:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- I did, and I didn't see any incivility. It's possible that I examined edits other than the ones to which you're referring, so please cite them. —David Levy 21:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)]
- I did, and I didn't see any incivility. It's possible that I examined edits other than the ones to which you're referring, so please cite them. —
- Just talk to him please, I tried, but he won't listen. CoolKatt number 99999 21:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I need you to cite the specific edits in which the user allegedly was uncivil. Otherwise, I'm afraid that I can't help you. —David Levy 21:45, 17 May 2006 (UTC)]
- I'm sorry, but I need you to cite the specific edits in which the user allegedly was uncivil. Otherwise, I'm afraid that I can't help you. —
- Are you joking me? Tell me how #1 Nominating your sub-pages for deletion, #2 Informing you of that, #3 Opening an RfC, #4 Informing you of that, and #5 responding to your uncivility is uncivil. --CFIF (talk to me) 21:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Indeed, I don't see any incivility on the part of CFIF. (The mere act of disagreeing with you is not uncivil.) —David Levy 22:03, 17 May 2006 (UTC)]
- Indeed, I don't see any incivility on the part of CFIF. (The mere act of disagreeing with you is not uncivil.) —
- Still he is bothering me and perhaps Wikistalking me. Could you help me there please? CoolKatt number 99999 22:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Let's accuse me some more of something I don't do. --CFIF (talk to me) 22:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thus far, you've failed to corroborate these allegations of wrongdoing. If such evidence exists, please present it as part of the
ArbCom caseRfC that CFIF filed. —David Levy 22:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)]
- Thus far, you've failed to corroborate these allegations of wrongdoing. If such evidence exists, please present it as part of the
Hold it. We've gotten to ArbCom? You just started the RFC and skipped Mediation entirely. The Arbitrators are really overworked, so don't add to it. I'm not going to side with either of you because I don't have to. Suspend the ArbCom case and possibly the RfC. CoolKatt, stop claiming incivility, that just exasorbates the issue. CFIF, don't act sour about it ("Let's accuse me some more of something I don't do"), and maybe stay away from CootKatt other than make comments (no more userspace deletion nominations). Let's try something: both of you do that for 48 hours, and then see if you still complain.--HereToHelp 00:35, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, that was an error on my part. (I meant to type "RfC.") No ArbCom case has been filed. —David Levy 17:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)]
Merging vs. deleting
That's not really what I meant. I think you should perhaps really have some of these pages deleted instead of just pasting them all together (it doesn't look very useful that way to me...). I will leave the issue open for another admin to decide. Kusma (討論) 01:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hello. While I had initially thought that having these subpages was harmless, did you know about this aspect? I still think it sucks to nominate someone's subpages for deletion, but there are some good reasons to delete (or re-shape) these. I'd prefer a co-operative outcome rather than some spiral of nastyness, so drop me a line on my talk if yuo want. - brenneman{L} 11:52, 18 May 2006 (UTC)]
WCTX and WPHL-TV
I am not vandalizing this article...repeat: I AM NOT VANDALISING THIS ARTICLE. Instead, you are (again) adding trivial information. Just because WCTX is imported into Springfield via cable, that doesn't automatically make the station part of the Springfield market. Heck, they don't even ID themselves as such. If you wish to continue to place this line in the article, keep it out of the main section.
While we're at it, WPHL-TV is NOT part of the Harrisburg-Lancaster market either, nor do they identify themselves as such. Just because it, too, is being imported via cable doesn't automatically mean it's one of the area's local stations -- do viewers in New York City claim WTBS or WGN-TV as one of their own? I didn't think so. Rollosmokes 17:50, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
MfD Result Notice
Hi,
I have closed the MfD on your subpages as a "no consensus/default keep." Best wishes, Xoloz 17:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
TV Market Templates
The majority opinion, if not consensus, is that out-of-market stations do not belong in the templates. I do not appreciate being called a vandal for going with consensus. I demand an apology. Kirjtc2 19:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- I apologize for asking for the apology. Real life's been fryaing my nerves the past few days. Kirjtc2 19:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Can you please tell me why you insist on including the Seattle stations on
I'm not gonna bother you with the other templates (since, frankly, it's not worth my time), but since Vancouver's my home market, I figure I should at least have some say in it. - Hinto 20:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Just that they're on cable in Van-Vic doesn't necessarily mean they serve Van-Vic. As I mentioned, the extent that KOMO "serves" Vancouver is including Vancouver's temperature on its maps; KING, KIRO, KCPQ, etc. don't even do that. And there's basically no mention of Van-Vic on Seattle stations (and vice versa) unless something big happens. If being on cable is the sole criterion for inclusion on the template, there's a whole bunch of other stations that could be included, but it'd be meaningless. - Hinto 20:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Re: Blueboy96
Coolkatt, you have made me laugh in your effort to stick up for Blueboy. This coming from someone who wastes precious space on Wikipedia with your "alternate history" pages on the Scripps-Howard television stations and of Louisville, largest city of the "Commonwealth of Whore". You can't seem to take constructive criticism when it comes to your edits, so you have the audacity to come at me? PUHLEEZZE!!
In my opinion, Blueboy's edits and additions have bordered on informative (which, when researched and written properly, are helpful) and sloppy (at times he has changed whole sentences, changing the entire continuity and context of paragraphs which someone else, such as myself, has had to clean up and revert). His contributions are as inconsistent as Alex Rodriguez's batting average with runners in scoring position. Blueboy needs to work on this and not be so sensitive. As for you, Coolkatt, you have no right to defend someone else when you are guilty of a whole lot worse. Most of us don't either, including myself. The difference between you and me is that I can accept and answer to criticism, and you can't.
BTW: I have read WP:OWN, and I believe that it applies more to you than to me. Rollosmokes 07:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Blueboy's edits are very good. You need to stop reverting his edits Rollosmokes, again because that is violating WP:OWN as well as WP:STALK.
Number one, you obviously (again) did not read my comments directly above this one, which explains my position. Secondly, you didn't have the guts to place this comment on MY TALK PAGE, so you had to run to Blueboy's and post it there. That is, to put it mildly, a weak move on your part. And lastly, I have read WP:STALK, and just as before, this applies more to YOU than it does to me. You're acting like a little child now. This is ridiculous. Rollosmokes 08:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Help again
- I recently was involved in a similar dispute with Rollosmokes, so I don't feel comfortable intervening in an administrative capacity. Please seek the assistance of another sysop. If you do, you're welcome cite this edit (in which Rollosmokes referred to me as "a self-absorbed, ego-driven, bombastic blowhard") as another example of his incivility. —David Levy 19:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)]
Rollosmokes speaks
I will refer back to an earlier comment:
- In my opinion, Blueboy's edits and additions have bordered on informative (which, when researched and written properly, are helpful) and sloppy (at times he has changed whole sentences, changing the entire continuity and context of paragraphs which someone else, such as myself, has had to clean up and revert). His contributions are as inconsistent as Alex Rodriguez's batting average with runners in scoring position. Blueboy needs to work on this and not be so sensitive.
This is not an condemnation on all of Blueboy96's contributions. In
Coolkatt's problem with me stems from my deleting of his sentences containing what can be viewed as "trivial", such as his favorite "largest (network) station on the UHF dial" reference. I told him that notes such as this should be placed in a separate section within the article, not within the main section.
This is professional, CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM. Nothing more and nothing less. Coolkatt has made it personal, so I answered back.
If you're reading this, Mr. Levy, then I apologize for my "incivility" towards you, but at the time that is how I viewed you in regards to our dispute. Rollosmokes 06:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- You wrote on my talk page: "You are going too far in labeling my edits as vandalism. Stop doing that, and I will also stop labeling your edits as vandalism." The truth is this: your edits ARE VANDALISM. You are adding nothing but trivial information, poorly-written sentences, and other useless junk into several articles. You also continue to go tit-for-tat with me on several articles which Blueboy96 and myself have worked extensively. You are reverting my work out of pure spite. That is childish. Like I've said, before you go after someone else, look at yourself in the mirror (before it cracks) and you'll see the REAL CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM. Rollosmokes 08:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Re:WTAE
Who is we, the only person that has said as such is you, and your the only that incerted it into the article. SOrry to tell you but Wheeling has no ABC affilate, in the boundaries of it's DMA their is no station that servies as an ABC affilate, WTAE is not within those boundaries. The station beeing carried on cable aslo does not make it an affilate for wheeling either, it also can nopt be an affilate becuas it does not have must-carry status either, which means that echa cable company must sign a contract witth the station in order to carry it and are not required to carry it. Yor inclusing that it is caried on cable in another market makes it no more an affilate then when i lived in Lansing, Michigan, and i could get stations from both detroit and Grand Rapids on both cable and OTA, and none of them were Lansing affilates, including the WB and UPN which Lansig at the time did not have. --
The CW Television Network
Hi. I reverted your most recent edit to
Category Sort Letter
Normally I'd agree with you, but WikiProject Television Stations did not. I changed the category sort letters to all be on the first letter because that was the ruling of the project. X Stryker 14:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
"Normally I'd agree with you, but WikiProject Television Stations did not." Which, apparently, he doesn't get, which is not an entire surprise. --CFIF (talk to me) 14:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Templates (see WP:RFPP)
I am not going to protect a boatload[9] of templates over two users, stop the edit warring and discuss, I'll have to block any edit warriors.
- First of that has hardly an endorcment in rither direction, and to answere your other point, see all of my comments on the project page. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 03:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)]
Hello fellow cat
Just wanted to say hi! :) --Cat out 14:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
I have been observing recent edits to this template, and am concerned that you could be breaking
- And, once again, I changed the template back to what it was before he re-reverted it for the umpteenth time. Rollosmokes 06:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi CoolKatt, Please stop referring to other editor's work on Wikipedia as vandalism. Thanks in advance, --Firsfron of Ronchester 19:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Susquehanna Valley TV
Hey, could you take a look at the SV list on that templates' talk page? The station that seems to be under contention (WPHL-TV) is, in fact, significantly viewed in Lancaster County (but only this county) according to the FCC.
In my opinion, this justifies including this station in this market as a "Significantly Viewed Out-of-Market Station", since that is exactly what it is. As you can see from the list, there are also several other stations that could be included in this list. I wouldn't suggest over-doing it, though. :-) AlexDW 00:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Re: Request for Comment on Rollosmokes
I'm not a religious person, but I have only one thing to say to you:
"He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at (him)." (John 8:7 [KJV])
Now, what do you have to say about that? Rollosmokes 06:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- ==AfD nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rollosmokes==
- I guess this means that I win, and you lose. Next!! Rollosmokes 07:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Stop it! Just stop it!
Can you just let the discussion on
- One more thing. People don't have a problem with your subpages because you "want to dream" or anything like that. They have a problem because Wikipedia is not a free host, blog, webspace provider or social networking site. In other words, it's not the place to share your dreams with the world. There are places like that, but Wikipedia isn't one of them. (Personally, I'm neutral on the subpage issue.) Morgan Wick 02:34, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Network Templates By State
Is there a real point behind this? I just don't see it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Starsfan23 (talk • contribs)
WTXF-TV
You insist on reverting to a version of this article that YOU edited, and quite poorly. Haven't you learned anything from your failed attempt to bully me? If there is anyone guilty of violating
Your version contains a revised paragraph that contains a re-written sentence ("Fox later cancelled its preliminary deal to purchase WGBS and joined the bidding for WCAU in case New World's bid fell through, as New World and Fox looked towards getting Fox programming on a VHF station in America's 4th-largest market") that did not have to be changed; the mention of Fox Kids here is irrelevant and unnecessary; the link to WPSG did not have to be moved; and the link to WTVZ should be changed to TVX Broadcast Group directly, as there is now an article with that title.
I will re-revert to the version that is of better quality. Please do not change it back. Rollosmokes 09:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
"I have asked you too many times. Please stop reverting my edits. If that is all you are going to do, then you should not come here."
Why are you taking all of this personally? And, after what you tried to do to me, then why should I listen to you? I'll make this plain and simple -- your edits are crap most of the time. Stop being so sensitive and learn how to be a better writer and editor. Rollosmokes 06:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- "your edits are crap most of the time."
- Thank you Rollosmokes, because someone finally had to say it. --CFIF (talk to me) 10:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Other Broadcast Networks
It looks as if we might need two "Others" categories, one for English stations and the other for Spanish and other foreign language stations -- each will have their own share of independent stations included... Because I'm starting to notice that some networks have concentrated affiliations in random areas (i.e.:
Reply to my message...
I've got Spanish Arizona on the slate. Template:Spanish Arizona. -
Possible soultions for the Other Networks in less favorable states
Reply to my message...
How to hide the I B Templates
Is there a way to hide these templates like the Navbox templates??? --
If you know somehow that does... Please have them leave me a message!!! --
- Nice job with the formatting!!! How did you figure it out??? --WIKISCRIPPS 07WED JUN 14 2006 2:22 PM EDT
- I also noticed you displayed a preview with the formatting -- You think you can make the changes to the default template (WIKISCRIPPS 07WED JUN 14 2006 2:31 PM EDT
- No I just checked... It's not there... WIKISCRIPPS 07WED JUN 14 2006 2:35 PM EDT
- No I just checked... It's not there...
- I can't see the "NavHide" feature on the article... What happened??? --WIKISCRIPPS 07WED JUN 14 2006 2:41 PM EDT
- I can't see the "NavHide" feature on the article... What happened??? --
Thank you for CW/MyTV Arizona move
I wanted to keep it low maintenance. CoolKatt, I didn't know what to do. Did you move
TV station lists by channel number
FYI I just created the last of the lists to go; namely channel 12. Georgia guy 16:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Other Station Template in VA.
Hello CoolKatt Number 99999, this is Time1. I would like to thank you for finishing up the template for the television stations in Virginia but I need your help to finish up the Other stations template. Good Job. Time1 16:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:PHX TV
I need help at Template:PHX TV. I am running into a wall that I need help with. I need not only someone who lives in Northern Arizona, I also need some work to add station articles, links to more MTs, a portal to Arizona's IBTs, and a cool NavHide for the top.
I really need help here. Meet me at User:TrackerTV/KXRM2X (KXRM2's talk page!) -
AFD
Please do not nominate AFD pages for deletion. If you want to prevent the article from being deleted, improve it and/or participate in the discussion. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Please do not remove warnings about inappropriate behavior as vandalism, either. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Fox Entertainment Group
Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia.
Those WV affiliate templates...
Nice work. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 03:16, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
PBS Arkansas???
I've lived in Arkansas for 30 years now, and I can honestly say there is no difference in the programming offered on any of the five component stations of the
Unblock request
{{unblock|I promise not to reinsert the content ever again}}
Blocked for recreation
I have warned you about this, and this isn't the first time it has been a problem.
Please do not recreate material deleted through the deletion process, such as AFD. In particular, I'm referring to reinserting the content of
]I won't do it again. Please unblock me, and I will go WP:DRV. CoolKatt number 99999 02:41, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Fair enough. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well, let me edit so I can go to WP:DRV, please. CoolKatt number 99999 02:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- You should be unblocked. If there's an autoblock causing troubles, please copy and paste it here so I can deal with it. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- How do I do that? CoolKatt number 99999 02:48, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- nevermind "Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "CoolKatt number 99999". The reason given for CoolKatt number 99999's block is: "Revert warring to restore deleted material, exacerbated b
- How do I do that? CoolKatt number 99999 02:48, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- You should be unblocked. If there's an autoblock causing troubles, please copy and paste it here so I can deal with it. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well, let me edit so I can go to WP:DRV, please. CoolKatt number 99999 02:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Your IP address is 68.21.245.163. " CoolKatt number 99999 02:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Help please? CoolKatt number 99999 02:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- I took care of the autoblock. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)