User talk:Cusop Dingle

Hello there. I almost never suggest that an editor who's marked himself as retired should reconsider, but I'm making an exception in your case. I'd actually written a thoughtful, friendly essay to tell you so, here, but my browser crashed and I lost it. Maybe I should limit myself to 100 open tabs or fewer? Anyway, in apparent exasperation over the resounding yawns you received at AN/I, you wrote something like, "We don't have to tolerate rudeness, and we certainly don't have to tolerate harassment."

I really wish you could have read my previous, now floating about in bits on the aether. It was comforting like warm apple pie and slightly melted ice cream, it was sensitive, it hit just the right note of collegiality without being too familiar, and it struck a near-perfect balance between self-effacing humour and knowing commiseration. ( Sniff; I really miss it. ) I guess I'll have to just be direct, instead. So .....

Welcome to Wikipedia! The real Wikipedia, I mean, where

is more like a soda straw than anything resembling a structural support. The rudeness you were met with was, not to put too fine a point on it, rather like a giddy puppy quivering all over with anticipatory glee at the intoxicating prospect of licking your ankles in a rapture of submissive ecstasy, in comparison to some of what we see here. I restored an external link at a certain admin's pet article, once, and he thrashed about in apoplexy for a good 15 minutes before he finally asserted it was, "a dirty, rotten, low-life trick". When he kept up the abuse, I took it to AN/I, and met with the same chorus of yawns you heard, essentially. After he very emphatically declared that I'm "an ass" and doubled down by insisting he'd "stand by" that assertion until Wikipedia becomes a reliable source, at AN/I of all places, a couple of admins told me (not him) that he probably shouldn't do that.

In retrospect, I find the whole episode pretty comical. At the time, of course, I was incensed, especially that no one would block the utensil, and was a fewer keystrokes away from posting a scorched-earth diatribe there by way of a retirement notice than I care to admit. I didn't, however, and later became acquainted, at one remove, with the touchingly childlike antics of a certain editor who regularly tells people, "fuck off", calls them "arsehole", and just generally acts like an overtired four-year old whenever anyone criticises or disagrees with him.

At first I was pretty incensed about that, too, that he was allowed to wander about the shop knocking newcomers over with his great fat backside flogging about like a kind of grotesque wrecking ball (ie "allowed to cause so much low dramah") ... for a while. Then, later, and for a while longer, I thought it just ridiculously funny. Then, eventually, I arrived at my current view: Maybe it's funny, viewed in one way, but the pathos of it really touches me. What must it be like, to have a default mode that requires one to interpret almost every criticism or disagreement as so urgent a personal threat that it demands an immediate escalating response to keep one's conscious self-view reasonably intact? What a damned heavy weight to have to carry into every interaction with others.

It's not that many admins wouldn't like to enforce civility, you know. They just don't bother, because they know some fool admin will always show up to unblock anyone who's been blocked over it. None of them wants to be the guy whose blocks are always overturned within minutes. Girls won't dance with admins who have that rep, at the Friday night admin mixers and pool parties. Or none of them would, I mean, if we still had any girls left on Wikipedia. I think we still had a few, as late as early 2010, but the boys were rude to them, and they left.

Right, then: I looked through your edit history, and you're an obvious credit to the project, even if you do happen to be almost entirely wrong in the view you expressed at RSN concerning IRmep. ;-) We disagree on that, I mean, although I haven't joined the party there ... yet, probably. But I see I've written another essay; delete it if you like. I really think the previous one was better. Cheers,  – OhioStandard (talk) 14:56, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Gertrude Tennant has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. (The copyrighted text was taken from the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.) — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 08:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in

.

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 18:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

Please comment on

Talk:Frank L. VanderSloot

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

JSTOR

Hi there. You're one of the first 100 people to sign up for a free

the requests page

. We're ready to start handing out accounts, if you'd still like one.

JSTOR will provide you access via an email invitation, so to get your account, please email me (swallingwikimedia.org) with...

• the subject line "JSTOR"
• your English Wikipedia username
• your preferred email address for a JSTOR account

The above information will be given to JSTOR to provide you with your account, but will otherwise remain private. Please do so by November 30th or drop me a message to say you don't want/need an account any longer. If you don't meet that deadline, we will assume you have lost interest, and will provide an account to the next person in the rather long waitlist.

Thank you! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:13, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your username commenting at an Arbcom discussion regarding civility. An effort is underway that would likely benifit if your views were included. I hope you will append regards at: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Civility enforcement/Questionnaire Thank you for considering this request. My76Strat (talk) 08:05, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

Please comment on

Talk:Sockpuppet (Internet)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

]