User talk:DaddyPedro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, DaddyPedro, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Jessica Simpson, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Lard Almighty (talk) 18:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lard Almighty,
Thanks for the feedback ! I am in no way affiliated with the podcast, I just listen to the podcast and saw that they were not referenced when looking up one of the subjects they covered, and thought it would be relevant for others who may want to learn about these topics to have an additional source to turn toward. Is there any way I can "prove" that this is not advertising ? I understand that I did not do it correctly but I think the information is still relevant to the pages I added it to. Any help to resolve this issue would be appreciated. Is it better if I add a link that does not bring to the podcast's page but instead just link the podcast's wikipedia page? I thought linking the podcast page would be "proof" but let me know if there is a better way. Thank you ! DaddyPedro (talk) 19:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please read
WP:RS. These podcasts are not reliable sources and therefore cannot be added. Lard Almighty (talk) 19:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Noted ! However for some of these, if they are not additional sources, they could still be relevant as part of a broader "other materials" or "in popular culture" type thing. For example the wiki page of another topic that they covered mentions them under "publications" : D.C. sniper attacks DaddyPedro (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If they are relevant you can add them in an appropriate section (In the media, See also etc.). But also bear in mind
WP:NPOV. Self-published sources that push theories or take positions on controversial matters tend to not be NPOV. And be careful about mass adding links as this often looks suspicious. Lard Almighty (talk) 19:52, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Noted, thanks ! DaddyPedro (talk) 20:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Template:2021 Canadian federal election/Saint-Léonard-Saint-Michel
has been accepted

Template:2021 Canadian federal election/Saint-Léonard-Saint-Michel
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]