User talk:Daggoth
HPDH Talk Page
Well i've left a question on the DH page on Horcruxes. Simply south 14:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Hmm ok thanks for clearing that up. I just thought it was fan discussion. I didn't know there was a confusion in the editing of the article re six or seven horcruxes. Reverted myself. =) Berserkerz Crit 08:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "clean" it up? If by edit the section to make it more clear how there are only six horcruxes and not seven, then by all means be bold. Berserkerz Crit 08:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)]
R.A.B.
Yep, it's no big deal. The previous link had incorporated.. either [[Insert text]] or [[Link title]] - I can't be certain which, and all it took was a small compromise of versions. All is well. Bobo. 06:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Wikifrenzy
Could you please engage into a dialog with Wikifrenzy ? you guys are totally polluting the histories now. --
- and your reverts seem to include some edits that actually appear to be proper edits. --WikiProject Television) 12:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC)]
(cur) (last) 11:12, 25 April 2007 Daggoth S (Talk | contribs) m (448 bytes) (Reverted 1 edit by Eblem identified as vandalism to last revision by Luna Santin. using TW)
Uh, slight error there, ace.
1 - It's *my* user talk page, not Luna's. I can't "vandalize" my own talk page.
2 - the block had expired
I'm exiting Wikipedia and don't want to leave a User Page or User Talk Page as a scratch pad for doofi.
Btw, see also:
The Luna_Sant comment was ageism, a prima facie violation of Wikipedia's ban on personal attacks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NPA
If you restore it -again, you're engaging in ageism, a prima facie violation of the personal attack ban:
"There is no bright-line rule about what constitutes a personal attack as opposed to constructive discussion, but some types of comments are never acceptable:"
"* Racial, sexual, homophobic, ageist, religious, political, or ethnic epithets directed against another contributor."
Eblem 13:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Ordinal numbers
Hi, I saw your message to
- I've had a discussion with MOS:NUM#Numbers in words is alright as it is. So I guess thats ok, though I prefer it being spelt out explicitly. - TwoOars (T | C) 19:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)]
Talkpage move
Hi. I've moved your talkpage history here following your rename. WjBscribe 16:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Notability
You recently edited an article for Dekker Dreyer... the article is up for deletion based on notability, and I would like to ask you to chime in on the discussion of that deletion. Wikimegamaster 22:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
This well-earned barnstar is to let you know your wonderful work on keeping Harry Potter articles free from vandalism, that is, speculation and silly spoilers, hasn't gone unnoticed. Have a blissful day, Peacent 04:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC) |
- Don't mention it, you richly deserve the star. This Harry Potter 7 stuff is driving me insane, I truly hope we can survive until 21st, too. Take good care, Peacent 06:58, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Re:Deathly Hallows death list
Thanks for letting me know. 17Drew 06:38, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for correcting my sloppy revert on Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film). Not many users pay attention to reverts! [1]
WikiProject Harry Potter roll-call
{{User WP Harry Potter}}
to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. Conversely, if you do not wish to be considered a member of the WikiProject, leave your name where it is and it will be moved to the Inactive Contributors section. If you wish to make a clean break with the Project you may move your name to the Known to have left section. Many thanks.Perth meetup
Perth Meetup
Other events:
| |
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook) |
There is a meetup happening this weekend in Perth, if you're interested. (You're in Category:Wikipedians in Perth.) — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 07:45, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current