User talk:Darklordofpinup

Hello, Darklordofpinup, and

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Writing about yourself is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians.

As this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Guidance for article subjects

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Armando Huerta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Darklordofpinup! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See

WP:AUTOBIO

. All statements also need to be sourced, starting with the date of birth.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Armando Huerta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 18:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The article needs sources not written about the subject, not by him. Social media like LinkedIn also shouldn't be used.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Armando Huerta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 22:38, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Armando Huerta. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 04:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Serious COI? I don't have any external relationship with anybody mentioned on the Armando Huerta page so the comment you posted isn't true. Please remove your false comment so that it doesn't affect the publication of my page. Darklordofpinup (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't have a conflict of interest with Armando Huerta, why did you say you were his manager on my talk page? I didn't even ask about that. Either you were lying then or you're lying now. BuySomeApples (talk) 08:43, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't lie. "External relationship" does not include a manager, or more accurately, beneficiary of his estate. Darklordofpinup (talk) 14:06, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If* it wasn't her or her manager. Typo. Darklordofpinup (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For example, Madonna. Who do you think wrote her page and cited all those references it wasn't her or her manager? The writer of her page is obviously affiliated with her. Same with all the other big artists you see on Wikipedia. Darklordofpinup (talk) 14:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just re-read my article and cannot see anything that links to websites that sell his work. You said it was "promotional". Can you point these promotional links out to me because I can't see them.

And again, every single artist page on Wikipedia links to sites that sell their work. Mine doesn't yet it won't get approved? Darklordofpinup (talk) 14:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. I just realized that although you've discussed your COI on different talk pages, it isn't disclosed on the draft talk page or your userpage yet. You should also read up on the guidelines for Wikipedia. BuySomeApples (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. BuySomeApples (talk) 19:45, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I have a feeling that the subject might actually be notable, but the referencing is just nowhere near adequate for me to accept this as it stands. None of the sources cited meets the

WP:GNG

standard, and there is far too much unreferenced information included. We need to be able to verify the information from reliable published sources, but cannot, which is especially worrying given the declared COI / possible UPE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Armando Huerta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.