User talk:Darthkayak

This user is an old account for Darth Coracle. This account should now be inactive but if it is still in use please inform Darth Coracle. See contribs—page moves—all logs—block log

Welcome!

Hello, Darthkayak, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 04:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to make edits in the specific places where you see fit. Have fun on your trip to whatever censored place you're going to. previously unsigned comment from user:Alexkyoung on 09:05, 20 June 2019

Thanks! In time I'll make those edits, (though I'll be gone for like a month). Darthkayak (talk) 21:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I noticed your reverting edit of my demography counts on the page of 76%. I was actually not trying to vandalize the page. I was pretty much working out the math as there was almost a missing 7% off the page. I chalked it up to the amount said as it seemed to fill in the missing percentage. I apologise if it appeared misleading. Just tried to sort out the maths behind.

Signed JoshuaistheFalco

Hi JoshuaIsTheFalco. I completely understand that feeling when the data has issues - as it is it appears to me that the article has somewhat unclear and conflicting sourcing for the demography. I know that you were acting in good faith, and I'm sorry for implying vandalism on your part; that really wasn't appropriate of me. The problem with your edit is that it violates

WP:ORIGINAL

to attempt to change the numbers in the that way you did. While we are allowed to perform simple arithmetic, when it comes to things like census data we need to be very careful and make sure we are consulting and presenting data from reliable sources rather than just changing the numbers until it looks right. What concerns me is that there was just a discussion on your talk page about this, so in the future I really recommend consulting the guidelines on original research before you try to make changes like that. And remember, you can always take it to the talk pages if you're unsure about something. Thanks,

Darthkayak (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2019 (UTC) Hi Darthkayak, I thank you for your reply and suggestions. I have just been looking around on Google and found a page from

]

You’ve deserved this

		The Civility Barnstar
		For keeping your cool and sticking to civility during this heated discussion. Hope we can agree on something. Rodrigo Valequez(🗣) 21:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020 AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Per your previous commentary on the same subject matter. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 17:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]