User talk:Dashmax1214plus

Hello, Dashmax1214plus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Walls (Louis Tomlinson album)‎‎ did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Muhandes (talk) 20:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nobody Is Listening, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 06:44, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

RCA UK is a trading style not a record label. The record label is called RCA Records, part of the RCA Group. There is no need to have RCA UK written on releases when the article points back to RCA Records and says they have UK and US Operations. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 09:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic (TALK!) 04:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. livelikemusic (TALK!) 03:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why you're continuing to go against MOS, despite many editors telling you not to? livelikemusic (TALK!) 02:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. livelikemusic (TALK!) 02:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why you're continuing to violate

Can you please explain why you're continuing to ignore the above MOS policies? livelikemusic (TALK!) 12:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am asking, once again, why you continue to defy the policies listed above, in an on-going process? Your edits violate MOS:OVERLINK, as it states (as quoted above): Generally, a link should appear only once in an article (song titles appear in previous sections of the article) In addition, MOS:TITLECAPS describes how non-formal titles (a.k.a. "rock version") should not be capitalized. You've been exhibiting this behaviour since April 2022, despite being warned since then to cease these edits. You've been warned about adding information without valid sources, as well, and yet continued to add the information in. You've continued to falsely cite your changes as "grammatical," which they are not (2 3 4 — which you added "typos" to your reasoning 5 — after violating the MOS:OVERLINK policy 6 7 8 9 — not citing "factual" errors 10 11 — not even grammatical at all 12 13) You even ignored an Administrative edit instructing you to stop these edits, which resulted in your block from editing the page, and upon return you've seen continued citing false MOS policies. And all of these edits span from April 9 to April 24, 2022. If we were to include latter months, there would likely be two-to-three times more edits of you falsely-citing things as "grammatical" or even as of late, per a guideline that does not exist. Please respond to this. I am attempting to make some kind of discussion. Failure to do so will show no sign of

be here for the proper reasons and to contribute to the encyclopedia for its overall greater good. As well, failure to respond, I will take this action to the higher level of position (for administrative action). livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:48, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (The Confetti Tour) for a period of 1 month because of disruptive editing, uncommunicative attitude in that area. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions again.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 15:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: I've tried having a discussion with this editor—despite their use of multiple accounts—and their editing patterns still persist. livelikemusic (TALK!) 02:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Flicker (album). Muhandes (talk) 15:21, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned many times before about the introduction of unsourced material. Surely you are not looking for a permanent block? --Muhandes (talk) 15:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Chromatica Ball. --Sricsi (talk) 12:22, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Fame Ball Tour and The Monster Ball Tour. --Sricsi (talk) 08:09, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic (TALK!) 22:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dashmax1214plus. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:41, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 15:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Two things combine here. First of all, after being blocked for socking, you made logged-out edits on at least two occasions, and on at least one of the articles you edited from your account as well. That's minor, but it adds up. Second, you do not seem to be interested at all in collaborating, and this is a collaborative project: you're edit warring, you don't discuss edits on talk pages, you leave few edit summaries, and you have not responded to the concerns uttered by other editors on your talk page. On a collaborative project, that's simply not acceptable. Please reconsider what Wikipedia is and how you can contribute and put your expertise to best use, and address these issues an any unblock request you may want to file. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dashmax1214plus DAshmaxddddgh 21:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]