User talk:DavidBoothroyd
No, of course I don't think there's a conflict of interest.
WP:AUTO says that you are more than welcome to correct errors in your article and you followed policies by listing suggestions on the talkpage. I have checked and have discovered that someone I thought you had changed your name to is in fact a separate person, so my comments are rendered irrelevant. Thank you for supporting me in this matter though. Hope your effort to anonymise goes well. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 00:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
]
- Hello David, I am certainly aware of your arbcom run-in and for me there certainly has been no conflict of interest. I support the subject of any BLP article being able to contribute in a healthy way. I didnt know you were gay and was being cautious. Best wishes! SqueakBox 02:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)]
Hi, thanks for the note. I've reverted the edit I made earlier. The reason I changed it was because the wording in the lead implied the Liberals as a current major party (I've never read the book). Bradley0110 (talk) 19:10, 21 November 2009 (UTC)