User talk:Davodd/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Cleaned September 6, 2004. To add comments click on the + in the tab at the top of this page. Davodd 07:53, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)

Davodd, it looks to me like you merged articles dispite a {{MergeDisputed}} tag, without even responding to

I am duplicating this comment at Communist Party USA, please respond there. -- Jmabel 18:28, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)

I was fixing/undoing it... then User:Benc put up the 'inuse' tag. He is done. So I am going back to COTW to undo my mistakes. Sorry. -- PFHLai 01:12, 2004 Sep 9 (UTC)

I have re-inserted your comment, and removed the vote that shouldn't be there. What happened was that two of the candidates had been pruned one day too early. I was trying to restore them, but I clumsily 'rollbacked' too much of the edit history. I hope everything is alright now. Please let me know if there are any more mistakes of mine at COTW that needs to be undone. Thanks. -- PFHLai 01:30, 2004 Sep 9 (UTC)

I realize that the claim I made about Cambridge instead of Boston may have been false. I simply switched some words around, because the claim that Bpstpm os a suburb of Cambridge is more obviously false. Boston is the big city in Middlesex County. I lived in Newton, another suburb of Boston in Middlesex County, for sixteen of the first eighteen years of my life. If suburb indeed means municipalities in the same metro region, then Cambridge is a suburb of Boston. Even if it doesn't, Boston is not by anyone's definition a suburb of Cambridge.

--128.119.74.149

On

im gorgous!!!!!

As you called the vote on the merging of the Indian Mutiny page, I would like you to consider extending the deadline. As an interested party, I wasn't aware of the vote until yesterday and hence wasn't able to put forward my arguemnt until 2 days before the end of the vote. I also think that many other parties would be interested in voting, if the vote ends tomorrow (with ony 5 votes cast) I don't think that it shows a valid conensus, perhaps a minimum vote count should be required? Mintguy (T) 09:37, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Where did you get

replied [[User_talk:%C6var_Arnfj%F6r%F0_Bjarmason#Image:Gestapo_Flag.jpg|here]]. --

17:00, 2004 Sep 12 (UTC)

Hello Davodd, I noticed your picture promotions in the archive. Could you make sure you include the vote tallies when promoting/demoting, this makes it easier for others like me to verify the procedure. Also, I think you forgot to include promoted images on

Hello, not to be a kvetch, but the image is missing Hawaii and Alaska. ~ FriedMilk 02:21, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks. 48 out of 50 ain't bad, though. ;) ~ FriedMilk 06:00, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC)

I saw you've added CSI to the cleanup list. Can you give some specific examples of the POV issues you mentioned, so I can spend some time fixing them? Personally, I found it a pretty good article, but I'd be happy to help improve it. Please direct a response to my talk page. -- 131.211.151.97 09:30, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)

• • That would be MGM 09:41, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)

Davodd, could you please tell me if a creator's commentary on a dvd is original research? It's not something hidden, nor is it uncommon; either a person chooses to listen or they don't. It doesn't stop the fact from existing though.

Much appreciated.Gnrlotto 02:49, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I'll be travelling from Oakland --> Palo Alto Friday (awaiting a weekend-long conference); would love to meet some Wikipedians in the area. +sj+ 21:37, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Almost everything on the

You may have a ref that will change my mind, but i'm deleting the section on DoD def'n of Upper Midwest. I've only found one ref], but it includes in appendix A (Glossary) a def'n of "prairie pothole" that says that's where they happen there, specifically in the Dakotas & MN, which are excluded by the def'n you gave. I'm doubting DoD has a consistent def'n, tho my ability to search DoD feels pretty lame right now. What do you think? --Jerzy(t) 20:29, 2004 Nov 15 (UTC)

Global protests against war on Iraq

I've merged

Thanks.

— Jeandré

, 2004-11-19t19:40z

In response to a complex situation on

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the