claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:35, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Link to
Skeptical science
Hello! I noticed you altered a link in
Skeptical science rather than to the Skeptical science website. You have therefore introduced an inaccuracy, in my opinion. Perhaps you would consider altering it back? I believe your edit was in good faith but mistaken. The pointer was intended to show where the image could be found, and also leads the reader to a more rich source of information. --Greenmaven (talk) 07:20, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
Hi Greenmaven--indeed the edit was in good faith. I noticed the first three images on the Global warming page--with the exception of this one--linked to the respective Wikipedia articles of the sources rather to their external links (which are of course available). That is why I assumed that the Wikipedia articles of the sources are preferable, and the reason why I thought it would be a good idea to update the reference. (When the image in question was originally added to the global warming page, the Skeptical Science page on Wikipedia had not yet been created--now, as of about 3 hours ago, it does exist.)--Dawei20 (talk) 07:23, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Skeptical Science
Please note that categorization of articles is mandatory; as long as the article does not have at least one proper category on it, the {{
uncat}} tag must remain there. If you want the tag off the article, then find a category that actually exists and add it to the article, because if the page shows up on the uncategorized articles list again I may lock it so that you can't edit it at all. Bearcat (talk) 07:09, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
Bearcat, thank you for categorizing it. I did not revert the edit because of that, I reverted it because your edit led to some bizarre formatting problems (multiple lines of text that did not wrap around the page anymore but overlapped through my pictures and beyond). Preview your original revision to see what I mean. --Dawei20 (talk) 16:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
License tagging for File:Akorn.png
Thanks for uploading
image copyright tags
to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from
this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
Orphaned non-free image File:Akorn.png
⚠
Thanks for uploading
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
Stefan2 (talk) 16:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
Disambiguation link notification for September 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
List of place names in the United States of Native American origin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muskogee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Dawei20. Voting in the
2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
