User talk:Dfroberg
Welcome!
Hello, Dfroberg, and
I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizardif you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Specific issue
Please don't add
]- Thanks for the help Iryna, being neutral is darn hard :) Dfroberg (talk) 09:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Indeed, it is! Unfortunately, I'm going to be flat out IRL for the next couple of weeks, so I possibly won't be able to stay on top of WP:NPOVdevelopment of the article. In as much as is possible, I'll respond to your content queries on article talk pages for the sake of transparency. Bear in mind that I cannot write on you behalf as that would be COI by proxy.
- Indeed, it is! Unfortunately, I'm going to be flat out IRL for the next couple of weeks, so I possibly won't be able to stay on top of
- As a heads up, having created this account, it's possibly only a matter of time before lurkers and trolls get wind of it. The nature of the project is that 'anyone can edit', and the nature of a-M is that you deal in extremely sensitive subject areas, therefore vandalism of your user page is not out of the question. Please see WP:PERSONALattacks, so please do report such activities should you be targeted in any way.
- As a heads up, having created this account, it's possibly only a matter of time before lurkers and trolls get wind of it. The nature of the project is that 'anyone can edit', and the nature of a-M is that you deal in extremely sensitive subject areas, therefore vandalism of your user page is not out of the question. Please see
- Apologies if this comes across as if I'm trying to put you off editing (and for being long winded). It is most certainly not my intention. If you have any other queries or concerns, please feel free to either leave a missive on my own talk page or ping me, and I'll respond as soon as I'm able. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC)]
- Apologies if this comes across as if I'm trying to put you off editing (and for being
- @Iryna Harpy: I appreciate the advice & guidance, I'm new at this! Dfroberg (talk) 02:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:AMN Frontpage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AMN Frontpage.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t) Josve05a (c) 11:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:AMN Frontpage.jpg
Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
June 2017
Dfroberg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't have multiple accounts and never will have, I'd love to see any evidence put forth stating the contrary, as I believe this is simply an attempt to stiffle attempts in building the
Decline reason:
Apart from the strong behavioral evidence, the block is based on a
]If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Favonian: What does "strong behavioral evidence" mean?! And technical evidence is quite impossible as I'm quite alone here, heck I even adjusted one comment where I forgot to login and commented in a discussion on a-M talk. Who am I suppoed to puppet be puppeted by?! Oddest thing though; don't seem to be a SPI opened against me, so how does that work? Dfroberg (talk) 16:54, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Favonian didn't say there was a sock puppet investigation. He carefully said there was a checkuser investigation. That was done by me. Just so it's clear to other administrators, the account you are accused of operating is TheDaneChris (talk · contribs · count). There are other accounts I blocked during my investigation. Those accounts are unrelated to you.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:19, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Favonian: & @Bbb23: TheDaneChris is not my account. I've had no discussions with anyone with that username about wikipedia in any way shape or form! So what did your checkuser investigation unveil that linked me to him?! And what in heavens name does "strong behavioral evidence" even mean? That we debate the same WP articles? That we strike the letter A on our keyboards in the same manner!? We are in the same timezone/continent? Please elaborate. Dfroberg (talk) 17:57, 11 June 2017 (UTC)