User talk:Dojarca/Archive4
Speedy deletion of Inverse curve
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!) 12:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, I am not an idiot, when I saw the article it had almost nothing, if you say stuff like that again, it will be classed as a personal attack, and could get you blocked, also don't remove the speedy deletion tags yourself! The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!) 12:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- You pu the tag 10 seconds after I created the article.--Dojarca (talk) 12:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh sorry for that then! The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!) 12:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- You pu the tag 10 seconds after I created the article.--Dojarca (talk) 12:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008
List of Roman legions
I don't think your source is authoritative. I don't believe a XXV legion ever existed. In any case the account of the Battle of Soissons (in Gregory of Tours Historia Francorum) does not specify the units involved, so this is pure speculation. Regards EraNavigator (talk) 09:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
My point is that there is no evidence , literary or archaeological, for a XXV legion. And all statements must be based on evidence. I suggest that you use authoritative sources for your research (i.e. books by university academics or reputable encyclopedias e.g. Encyclopedia Britannica) and NOT other websites, which are often full of inaccuracies and even inventions. Best wishes EraNavigator (talk) 10:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
My RfA
File:David,larry.JPG | My RFA | |
Thank you muchly for your support in my recent request for adminship, which was successfully closed on 76%, finishing at 73 supports, 23 opposes and 1 neutral. The supports were wonderful, and I will keep in mind the points made in the useful opposes and try to suppress the Larry David in me! Now I'm off to issue some cool down blocks, just to get my money's worth!
Kidding btw. All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC) |
Krasnikov
- I believe you made an error in moving the article Serguei Krasnikov (physicist) – from "Serguei Krasnikov" to "Sergei Krasnikov". I've moved it back per correction. While we were working together at Starlab, and in all personal communications following, Serguei has used the former spelling convention in all correspondence and grant proposals. I've attached to the article, for your review, links and references to the NASA Advanced Propulsion grant announcement, to Krasnikov's Starlab Discovery Channel interview, to his Friedmann lab homepage and curriculum vitae. Please feel free to contact me via my user page if you have any questions on the matter. There's a contact link under my first reference [1] – Kind regards, Altman
Romanisation
Hi Dojarca,
Thank you for your support. I don't know yet how to submit a request but when I do, I will ask for your support. Regards, Anatoli Titarev. --Atitarev (talk) 22:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)