User talk:DonnaK97
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, DonnaK97, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizardif you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
-- Irn (talk) 22:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Well Done
Hi DonnaK97, You are doing awesome in contributing to Wiki articles for StarPlus shows. Really appreciate your works. However I suggest you to please keep the format and templates of all the shows in constant and in sync with each other. I did that for a few shows yesterday but found you reverted in one show
February 2012
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to ss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon?, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Sparthorse (talk) 07:13, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Your recent editing history at revertson a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
- Since you made another revert in a 24-hour period, I have started a section at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DonnaK97 reported by User:Aspects (Result: ). Your participation in the discussion would be appreciated. Aspects (talk) 06:24, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Iss_Pyaar_Ko_Kya_Naam_Doon
Can you explain why yu made this edit? The Plot section is clearly in violation of several Wikipedia rules, including
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC)- I have no idea where you got the idea that you can just hit the revert button for literally every edit made to an article, no matter how benign, but it is not how we do things on Wikipedia. Please take time to understand this or the next time you may be blocked indefinitely. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article
Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a
Blocked
illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text ]{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —DoRD (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2012 (UTC) |
May 2012
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -Philippe (talk) 20:44, 2 May 2012 (UTC)ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current