User talk:Drankcarat

.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:40, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drankcarat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not sock. I did use about 3-4 account, without socking. I never received a block on any of the accounts, nor did I edit the same articles with the accounts, nor appeared as two at any point. This block is incorrect since there was no socking involved with the other accounts. They are,

Libya Civil War without socking. Drankcarat (talk) 07:57, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Decline reason:

If you are using different accounts to edit the same article, it is socking. 331dot (talk) 10:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drankcarat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My bad. I've read

WP:SOCK#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts and did not catch a part about "not editing the same article with different accounts". In any case I am now aware of it, and promise to do not repeat it again. I also acknowledge that I will be rightfully blocked if I do so. I think it was a somewhat over-warning to indef block all my 4 accounts for this issue, that would've been permanently solved with a user warning. I'd like to request Administrator attention for unblocking once again, thank you. Drankcarat (talk) 19:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Decline reason:

Probably RandomAccount1235423 (talk · contribs). Block converted to indef. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drankcarat, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Shadow4dark (talk) 19:13, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]