User talk:DynaGuy00

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Asherdonohue, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Community Choice Aggregation. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to

talk) 22:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Social-Graphic-2.png

Thanks for uploading

here
- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Together for the Gospel (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:44, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Teahouse logo
Hello, DynaGuy00! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:44, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

February 2020

Hello, I'm Gladamas. I noticed that in this edit to Artistic language, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 19:20, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gladamas: Thank you for the heads up! I definitely will do that moving forward, and understand the confusion that could cause. If you look at the material I took down, it is a verbatim copy of what is directly above it (someone must have accidentally copied it). Therefore, it seems best that the material does end up going down, although this time with a more thorough explanation. Looking at the activity in the talk page, the last post from a non-bot is 2014, probably meaning it hasn't seen a ton of activity. DynaGuy00 (talk) 19:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 19:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
The Benedict Option
(January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 20:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Benedict Option has been accepted

The Benedict Option, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Worldbruce (talk) 07:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Trump lead

Hey, can I take over this idea? People are suggesting shutting it down, and I really don't want that. Cessaune [talk] 17:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes absolutely! You have my permission to copy/edit/change in order to get it to a better place. Honestly even just getting the basic format changed I think would be an improvement. Thanks for asking and good luck. DynaGuy00 (talk) 20:26, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Could you start a RFC on it? I support your changes. @DynaGuy00:. The first attempt you made wasn't a RFC. KlayCax (talk) 10:40, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will do my best. Thanks for the support. DynaGuy00 (talk) 21:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Although as I look at it more closely @KlayCax it seems like it wouldn't even change much. All of the later edits really altered my original conception of it so much that at this point I don't care that much. But go for it if you want. DynaGuy00 (talk) 01:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Ruen Brothers
(August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:45, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Concern regarding
Draft:Ruen Brothers

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 06:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]