Search results

so the section don't split up. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 07:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC) hi @Edokter/Archive 9: ! from here I took code and pasted here...

get no exceptions at all and IE safely ignores the :before selectors. — Edokter (talk) — 22:49, 20 December 2012 (UTC) I cannot reproduce it anymore. i...

will get you blocked. — Edokter • Talk • 00:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC) See previous discussion at MediaWiki talk:Common.js/Archive Jan 2008#Internet Explorer...

16 February 2011 (UTC) BBC One and BBC One HD are the same channel. — Edokter (talk) — 17:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC) Okay, I misread. I apologise. I...

deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 7 May 2022 (UTC) MediaWiki:User:Edokter/Main Page2.css, a page which you created or substantially contributed to...

wraps all items in <li>...</li> tags. Redirecting will break stuff. — Edokter (talk) — 13:32, 22 November 2011 (UTC) It would be catastrophic. There...

your opinion there? -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 20:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC) See my response at User talk:Edokter/Archive 9#Navboxes. "Venting my opinion"...

it, or better, delete it. — Edokter • Talk • 18:08, 9 December 2010 (UTC) Edokter, to where did you move the auto archiving notice when you removed it...

belonged to Series 9 or 10. Bottom line is: tyhey should not be split up. It would no longer be the list of serials/episodes. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 20:35...

Hello, Edokter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you...

that the IP you are posting from may be used by more then one person. — Edokter • Talk • 02:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC) He IS engaging in personal threats...

where the problem is. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 16:58, 9 January 2015 (UTC) § To do should link to User:Edokter/Archive 8#To do. —174.141.182.82 (talk)...

Hello, I'm Edokter. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Doctor Who (series 9), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed...

to one page. Why did you remove them? -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 10:55, 11 April 2016 (UTC) @Edokter: No. Why? There are no <noinclude>...</noinclude>...

unnecessary and they look unwieldly in source. Could you please undo those? — Edokter (talk) — 21:59, 17 December 2011 (UTC) I was usuing a tool to fix minor...

</noinclude> was the cause. — Edokter (talk) — 14:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC) Oh, alright, thanks for your help Edokter. Regards, — Moe ε 14:54, 7 December...

Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 15:54, 11 May 2012 (UTC) I think Edokter has a good solution. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib. 07:45, 13 May...

appropriate) one by Edokter, and the second a followup dummy edit I made riffing off his edit summary: [1] Edit summary (Edokter): i and 1 are too alike...

where deletions were endorsed, and there was one were a keep decision (by Edokter) was appealed (by F.N.) and led to relisting and later deletion. So where...

that fix seems to have been rendered ineffective, Please have a look. — Edokter • Talk • 14:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC) To add, I don't know if it even...