User talk:Enkhzaya.b

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Nambaryn Enkhbayar, you may be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Nambaryn Enkhbayar. --Latebird (talk) 23:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Latebird (talk) 23:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This is related to your continued deletion of information at Nambaryn Enkhbayar. If you continue after the block expires, it is likely that the next block will have a much greater length. Nyttend (talk) 12:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Continued removal of sourced material after prior block at the same article, as you did at Nambaryn Enkhbayar. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  JodyB _talk 15:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]